Assessing Safety Net Readiness in Response to Food Price Volatility
Keywords
PROGRAM COVERAGEFEE WAIVERS
SUPPORT PROGRAM
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE
CONFLICT
AGRICULTURAL LAND
TARGETING MECHANISMS
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
BENEFICIARY
CASH SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
WHEAT
DROUGHT
PAYMENT SYSTEM
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
RICE
EXTREMELY POOR HOUSEHOLDS
FOOD POLICY
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
SOCIAL PENSIONS
INTERNATIONAL MARKET
TARGETED TRANSFERS
SOCIAL PROTECTION
AGRICULTURAL LABORERS
FOOD RATIONS
POVERTY RATES
POOR HOUSEHOLD
FUTURE PRICE
FOOD PRICE INFLATION
INCOME TRANSFERS
FOOD FOR WORK
HEALTH SERVICES
CEREALS
SHOCK
CHILD ALLOWANCES
VULNERABLE PEOPLE
RATION SHOPS
TAX
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
FOOD SUBSIDY
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
SCHOOLING
RISING INEQUALITY
MAIZE
WORK PROGRAM
SOCIAL WELFARE
TRANSACTIONS COSTS
DIETARY DIVERSITY
CAPACITY BUILDING
COMMODITY
NUTRITION PROGRAMS
PENSION
TRACK RECORDS
BENEFIT LEVELS
SAFETY NET PROGRAMS
FOOD PRICE SUBSIDIES
DISABILITY PENSIONS
CHRONIC POVERTY
ACCESS TO SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
CREDIT FACILITY
INCOME ON FOOD
MALNUTRITION
EXPOSURE
FOOD NEEDS
ATM CARDS
POVERTY REDUCTION
COMMODITY PRICES
HEALTH INTERVENTIONS
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
FOODS
SAFETY NET SYSTEM
COPING STRATEGIES
INCOME SHOCKS
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
TECHNICAL CAPACITY
ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
FOOD SECURITY
SAFEGUARDS
FOOD CONSUMPTION PATTERNS
WELFARE LAW
RURAL REGIONS
CLIMATE CHANGE
FOOD ON CREDIT
HOME RATIONS
WORLD DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS
SOCIAL FUND
UNIVERSAL BENEFITS
GRAIN RESERVES
GRAINS
CLIENT COUNTRIES
CASH PAYMENT
FINANCIAL CRISIS
CALORIC INTAKE
POOR COUNTRIES
RURAL EMPLOYMENT
HOUSEHOLD FOOD INSECURITY
HUMAN CAPITAL
SUGAR
CONSUMPTION BASKET
MEDICAL INSURANCE
POVERTY LINE
CONDITIONAL CASH
PRENATAL CARE
PRODUCTIVE ASSETS
POOR POPULATIONS
ACCESS TO FOOD
UNIVERSAL TRANSFER
COUNTRY RISK
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
FOOD STOCKS
PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS
PUBLIC WORKS
UNEMPLOYMENT
DOMESTIC PRICE
FOOD PRICE
TARGETING
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
POOR
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POVERTY IMPACT
CASSAVA
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
POOR PEOPLE
CHILD BENEFITS
FOOD IMPORTS
HEALTH CENTERS
FOOD DISTRIBUTION
PROTECTION SYSTEM
POOR AREAS
INFLATION RATE
RURAL
FLAT RATE
FOOD AID
WORKS PROGRAM
FOOD STAMP
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT
MEANS TEST
MICRONUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES
SUBSISTENCE
WORKFARE
SAFETY NET
FOOD BASKET
EXCHANGE RATE
DATA AVAILABILITY
SOCIAL POLICIES
SSN
FISCAL RISK
PURCHASING POWER
INEQUALITY
SOYBEANS
ECONOMIC CRISIS
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME
POOR GROUPS
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
PUBLIC DEBT
TRANSITORY INCOME
FOOD STAPLES
CASH TRANSFER
HEIGHT FOR AGE
MINIMUM WAGES
POOR FAMILIES
EMERGENCY FEEDING
NEW POOR
INFORMATION SYSTEM
NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS
FORTIFIED FOODS
VULNERABLE GROUP
INCOME SUPPORT
FOOD ITEMS
MICRONUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTATION
RURAL POPULATION
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMS
INCOME
RURAL POOR
CASH BENEFIT
CHRONICALLY POOR
RURAL ACCESS
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
RURAL DISTRICTS
SOCIAL SERVICE
MEANS TESTING
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE
EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE
SCHOOL FEEDING
FISCAL DEFICITS
MALNOURISHED CHILDREN
FOOD CONSUMPTION
FINANCIAL SERVICES
FOOD COMMODITIES
TRANSFER PROGRAM
CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
PRICE VOLATILITY
RURAL AREAS
CLIENT BASE
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
SECURITY RISK
TEMPORARY JOBS
SOCIAL TRANSFERS
VOUCHERS
STAPLE FOODS
PRICE RISKS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26825Abstract
In 2008, when food prices rose
 precipitously to record highs, international attention and
 local policy in many countries focused on safety nets as
 part of the response. Now that food prices are high again,
 the issue of appropriate responses is again on the policy
 agenda. This note sets out a framework for making quick,
 qualitative assessments of how well countries' safety
 nets prepare them for a rapid policy response to rising food
 prices should the situation warrant. The framework is
 applied using data from spring 2011, presenting a snap?shot
 analysis of what is a dynamically changing situation. Based
 on this data safety net readiness is assessed in 13
 vulnerable countries based on the following criteria: the
 presence of safety net programs, program coverage,
 administrative capacity, and to a lesser degree, targeting
 effectiveness. It is argued that these criteria will remain
 the same throughout time, even if the sample countries
 affected will be expected to vary. Based on this analysis
 the note highlights that though a number of countries are
 more prepared than they were in 2008, there is still a
 significant medium term agenda on safety net preparedness in
 the face of crisis. In this context, strategic lessons from
 the 2008 food crisis response are presented to better
 understand the response options and challenges facing
 governments and policy makers. The note concludes by calling
 for continued investment and scale up of safety nets to
 mitigate poverty impacts and help prevent long term setbacks
 in nutrition and poverty.Date
2017-06-01Type
Working PaperIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/26825http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26825
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Vietnam : Strengthening the Social Safety Net to Address New Poverty and Vulnerability ChallengesWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-03-15)As it transitions to Middle-Income Country (MIC) status, Vietnam is considering whether its social protection system is adequate to meet rapidly changing needs associated with strong economic growth, integration of its economy in regional and global markets, industrialization, urbanization and other economic and societal shifts. Vietnam's social safety net - programs with the following objectives: 1) alleviation of chronic poverty; 2) help to the poor in coping with the worst forms of shocks and transient poverty; and 3) promotion of human development for long-term poverty alleviation. This note aims to assess the system of social safety net programs currently in place in Vietnam and to gauge how well it covers the poor and vulnerable populations. This note highlights two messages: first, it identifies gaps in the current poverty reduction and social protection system - programs that help address urban vulnerability and poverty and that help the poor and vulnerable manage shocks - which could be closed through strengthened and more effective household-targeted social safety net programs. Second, in examining the existing core social safety net programs the note finds that, while targeting is respectable, their primary weakness lies in limited coverage. Based on these findings, this note strengthens household-targeted social safety net interventions in Vietnam as a complement to geographically-targeted poverty reduction programs and social insurance.
-
Eligibility Thresholds for Minimum Living Guarantee Programs : International Practices and Implications for ChinaO'Keefe, Philip; Wang, Dewen; Umapathi, Nithin (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-11)Using a simple framework, this paper
 discusses the underlying reason of the variation of
 threshold level in developed countries, from the least
 generous 20 percent to around 60 percent of median wage,
 with an average of 35 percent. The generosity of minimum
 guarantee social assistance programs is deeply rooted in
 social values and principles that further underpin the
 policy objectives. Many Organizations for Economic
 Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries set their
 policy targets for minimum living standard programs beyond
 basic needs and aim to guarantee a minimum socially
 acceptable level for a decent living. Thresholds are also
 refined to reflect the differences in family size and
 demographic structure, difference in regional cost of living
 and changes in prices and local wages. In some countries the
 thresholds show some regional variation due to local
 discretionary powers of sub-national authorities to set the
 threshold depending on the co-financing mechanisms. These
 lessons are valuable for China as the Chinese government has
 made efforts to standardize the implementation and
 management of its own minimum income guarantee (Di Bao)
 programs. The policy recommendations for China include
 accelerating the convergence of localized approaches,
 raising the administrative level for setting thresholds to
 higher level, defining the roles of central and local
 governments in financing and management, and establishing a
 transparent budgetary management system to transfer and
 allocate social assistance funds.
-
Social Safety Net in the Kyrgyz Republic : Capitalizing on Achievements and Addressing New ChallengesWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-02-19)The present report was prepared upon the request of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic to inform policy decisions on reforming the existing safety net. The report aims at providing analytical underpinning of the country's ongoing safety net reform, along with venue for policy discussions with the Government and stakeholders on the immediate as well as on the longer-term challenges related to designing and implementing of a modern national safety net. The report's focus is on the analysis of the poverty reduction impact, targeting accuracy and coverage of the existing non-contributory social benefits, the poverty-targeted Unified Monthly Benefit (UMB) in particular, with the objectives of recognizing the strengths on which the reform can capitalize, identifying opportunities for improvement and fostering consensus building among Kyrgyz policymakers regarding the options for reforming the UMB and the broader vision of public policy in social assistance and the feasible instruments for its implementation. The focus of the report on the UMB is also determined by the need of identifying safety net instruments for mitigating the adverse effects of the economic shocks which are already affecting ECA countries, including the Kyrgyz Republic, on the poor and vulnerable. The safety net in the Kyrgyz Republic faces multiple objectives: (a) to redistribute income to the poorest and most vulnerable, with an immediate impact on poverty and inequality; (b) to help households manage risks by maintaining consumption and assets in the outburst of shocks, such as the food, fuel, financial and economic crises; and (c) to protect the livelihoods of the negatively affected by structural reforms aimed at economic growth and efficiency gains.