Author(s)
Ozgediz, SelcukKeywords
CAPITAL COSTSAGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT BANKS
RESEARCH
NATIONAL RESEARCH SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER DEVELOPMENT CENTER
LIVESTOCK
CGIAR RESEARCH
LIVESTOCK RESEARCH
WHEAT
RESEARCH CENTERS
ILRAD
RICE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
GRAIN LEGUMES
LEGUMES
POTATO
PLANT BREEDING
CIAT
BIODIVERSITY
LENTILS
RICE RESEARCH
AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES
CEREALS
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE
MILK
DWARF VARIETIES
REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
CGIAR RESEARCH AGENDA
CROP VARIETIES
GENETIC DIVERSITY
RICE VARIETIES
CGIAR
CGIAR SECRETARIAT
TUBERS
IITA
FAO
DISEASES
ICIPE
BIOTECHNOLOGY
MAIZE
INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK CENTER FOR AFRICA
INIBAP
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE
WEST AFRICA RICE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
FOOD LEGUMES
DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS
BEANS
INTERNATIONAL RICE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
CIMMYT
AGRICULTURAL POLICIES
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
CGIAR PRINCIPLES
COMMISSION ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES
NARS
AGRICULTURE
POTATOES
FORESTRY RESEARCH
SCIENCE
MALNUTRITION
GREEN REVOLUTION
WARDA
NATURAL RESOURCES
APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SYSTEMS
SOIL MANAGEMENT
GENETIC RESOURCE
PLANTAIN
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION
WORLD FOOD PRIZE
INTERNATIONAL PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES
WHEAT YIELDS
ISNAR
FOOD CROPS
FOOD SECURITY
ICRISAT
COWPEA
MARKETS
AGRICULTURAL INFORMATION
FORD FOUNDATION
AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION
CLIMATE CHANGE
GERMPLASM
INTERNATIONAL IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
AVRDC
BREEDING
TECHNOLOGY
WATER BUFFALO
PROGRAM REVIEWS
IPGRI
DENMARK
COMMODITIES
INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
BEAN
GENETIC MATERIAL
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
WATERSHED
TREES
GENEBANKS
ACCESS TO FOOD
GENETIC RESOURCES
AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
CGIAR SYSTEM
CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH
TROPICAL AGRICULTURE
IRRI
CGIAR CENTERS
POPULATION
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR TROPICAL AGRICULTURE
ASIAN CROPPING SYSTEMS NETWORK
INTERNATIONAL SERVICE FOR NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
IIMI
CGIAR GENETIC RESOURCES POLICY
MEXICO
USAID
VEGETABLES
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
YAM
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
UNITED NATIONS
CIP
FARMING
CASSAVA
RURAL POVERTY
MILLET
INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTER
FOOD PRODUCTION
IFPRI
NATIONAL RESEARCH
UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
BUDGETS
ILCA
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
CATTLE
CROPS
AGRICULTURE PROGRAM
RUMINANT LIVESTOCK
THE CONSULTATIVE GROUP
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
ANIMAL PRODUCTION
CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
SORGHUM
IRRIGATION
CGIAR GENETIC RESOURCES POLICY COMMITTEE
PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES
INTERNATIONAL PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES INSTITUTE
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH NEEDS
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
BARLEY
UNDP
ROOTS
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
FORESTRY
CROP GROWTH
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
ANIMAL DISEASES
CROPPING
CGIAR RESEARCH PROGRAMS
ICARDA
RANGE MANAGEMENT
SOILS
CROPPING SYSTEMS
GERMPLASM CONSERVATION
GRAIN
CROP PROTECTION
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SYSTEMS
PLANS
FORESTS
MEAT
FARMERS
PLANNING
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
EXTERNAL PROGRAM REVIEWS
TRAINING
IDRC
ANIMAL HEALTH
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
CGIAR COMMITTEES
VEGETABLE PRODUCTION
CGIAR MEMBERS
GENETIC RESOURCE CONSERVATION
INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTERS
ICLARM
CROP MANAGEMENT
RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT
ECOLOGY
REPORTS
INVESTMENT
SOIL RESEARCH
ANIMALS
CGIAR TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
CROP
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTERS
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
AGROFORESTRY
IFDC
FARMING SYSTEMS
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
VEGETABLE RESEARCH
CGIAR GENETIC RESOURCES
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH NETWORK
CREDIT
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23845Abstract
The Consultative Group on International
 Agricultural Research (CGIAR) has been one of the most
 successful research-for-development organizations over the
 past 40 years. The $11 billion invested by CGIAR donor
 members in research conducted by the international Centers
 under its umbrella has yielded many multiples of that sum in
 economic benefits to developing and emerging countries.
 Annual economic benefits of research on rice in Asia alone
 are equivalent to the total investment made by CGIAR donors
 over 4 decades, leaving aside benefits in other continents
 and from other research conducted by CGIAR institutions. The
 CGIAR‘s success is due in part to the way it was organized.
 The Group itself was an informal forum for dialogue among
 donor members about research priorities, investment options,
 and the continuing relevance and effectiveness of the
 institutions supported. The international centers
 constituted the core of the CGIAR. Each was (and still is)
 an autonomous international organization governed by an
 international board. The Group and the Centers were
 originally advised by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
 of distinguished scientists from developing and developed
 countries, each appointed as an individual. The Group’s
 activities were facilitated by its Secretariat based at the
 World Bank in Washington, DC, and TAC’s activities by
 another secretariat based at the food and agriculture
 organization in Rome.Date
2016-03-03Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/23845http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23845
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Egypt - Linking Funding to Outputs : Expenditures of the Ministry of Agriculture and Land ReclamationWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This review of the on-budget expenditure of the Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR) in Egypt describes the broad outline of the MARL's expenditures and identifies key themes and issues. The report examines how the context of the agricultural sector has changed, and the adjustment challenge that such change poses for the MALR. It explains how the MALR is thinking about the future, describes the structures of the MALR, and presents expenditure trends for the MALR down to the sector or authority level. Also, the document identifies some key issues to be addressed and zooms in on the research institutions of the MALR, the Agricultural Research Centre and the Desert Research Centre.
-
Sustainable Agricultural Productivity Growth and Bridging the Gap for Small-Family FarmsWorld Trade Organization; World Food Programme; CGIAR Consortium; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; United Nations High Level Task Force on Global Food Security; International Food Policy Research Institute; International Fund for Agricultural Development; et al. (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-06-12)Global agriculture will face multiple
 challenges over the coming decades. It must produce more
 food to feed an increasingly affluent and growing world
 population that will demand a more diverse diet, contribute
 to overall development and poverty alleviation in many
 developing countries, confront increased competition for
 alternative uses of finite land and water resources, adapt
 to climate change, and contribute to preserving biodiversity
 and restoring fragile ecosystems. Climate change will bring
 higher average temperatures, changes in rainfall patterns,
 and more frequent extreme events, multiplying the threats to
 sustainable food security. Addressing these challenges
 requires co-ordinated responses from the public and private
 sectors and civil society that will need to be adapted to
 the specific circumstances of different types of farmers in
 countries at all levels of development. The recommendations
 provided are broadly of two types: specific actions that can
 contribute in some way to improving productivity growth or
 sustainable resource use (whether building on existing
 initiatives or suggesting new activities) and more general
 proposals that may not be actionable as presented but that
 serve to highlight areas for priority attention. This report
 also invites G20 countries to engage in a medium, to
 long-term, analysis-based peer review of policies fostering
 sustainable productivity growth, which would identify
 specific constraints and opportunities, beginning with their
 own food and agriculture sectors. In addition to possible
 benefits to participating countries, a peer review process
 could contribute to the identification of best policies and
 best policy packages to achieve the widely held aim of
 sustainably improving productivity of the global food and
 agriculture system. While such an initiative is proposed to
 and for G20 countries, it could have much wider application
 to interested countries.
-
Global Public Policies and Programs : Implications for Financing and EvaluationFerroni, Marco; Gerrard, Christopher D.; Mody, Ashoka; Gerrard, Christopher D.; Mody, Ashoka; Ferroni, Marco (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013-06-17)These are the proceedings from a World Bank workshop on global public policies, and programs, assembled from transcripts, and accompanying papers. The combination of market failure, and limited institutional capacity to influence economic, and social change across national borders, underlies public discontent with aid. This formed the basis for discussions, looking for new approaches to the development assistance business, taking into account the growing integration of the global economy, and arguing that, beyond supporting market-friendly reforms, aid strategies must be designed to overcome social, and structural constraints to sustainable development. The broad range of cases examined include efforts to craft commonly accepted standards for the design, and operation of large dams; they address issues of global financial instability; explore the implications of intellectual property rights protection for developing countries; describe the promotion of international agricultural research; probe the implementation of international public health programs; and, identify the dilemmas associated with the financing, and evaluation of global public policies, and programs. Such programs have become center stage because of irreversible processes associated with globalization, and, similar initiatives will dominate the development scene for years to come.