Montana Environmental Information Center v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining
Author(s)
Chandler, Lowell J.Keywords
Social Cost of Carbonclimate change
climate impacts
NEPA
environmental assessment
environmental impact statement
coal mining
coal transportation
coal trains
coal leasing
coal combustion
coal leasing
injunction
Montana
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act
mineral leasing act
greenhouse gases
non-profit
mining
coal
Energy and Utilities Law
Environmental Law
Natural Resources Law
Nonprofit Organizations Law
Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr/vol0/iss8/23https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1557&context=plrlr
Abstract
In MEIC v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining, the cost of coal mining’s climate impacts and the agency’s NEPA review obligations are at issue. The United States District Court for the District of Montana found that the Office of Surface Mining and Enforcement failed to adequately consider the need for an EIS and to take a hard look at the indirect, cumulative, and foreseeable impacts of a proposed coal mine expansion in central Montana. In its NEPA analysis, the court concluded that if the benefits of a carbon-intensive project are quantified, then the costs to the climate should be also, using the Social Cost of Carbon Protocol tool. The court held that the Enforcement Office was arbitrary and capricious in its EA of the proposed coal mine expansion and in its consideration of an EIS.Date
2018-02-05Type
textIdentifier
oai:scholarship.law.umt.edu:plrlr-1557https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr/vol0/iss8/23
https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1557&context=plrlr