Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) : Reviewing the Link with In-Country Policy and Planning Processes - Synthesis Report
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
DISCRETIONCOUNTRY POLICIES
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
POLICY PROCESS
INSURANCE
SOCIAL ANALYSIS
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
SOCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
POLICY ACTION
POLICY DEBATE
GOVERNANCE INDICATORS
TRUST FUNDS
WATER POLICY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
DEVELOPMENT POLICY OPERATIONS
ANALYTICAL GAPS
CONSUMPTION PATTERNS
FOCUS GROUPS
POOR PEOPLE
M&E
POLICY NOTE
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
INSURANCE SCHEMES
DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS
DOMESTIC POLICY
POLICY AGENDA
POLICY MAKING
FINANCIAL CRISIS
ANALYTICAL WORK
POLICY ADVICE
CLIMATE CHANGE
COUNTRY OWNERSHIP OF REFORMS
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
QUALITATIVE METHODS
QUANTITATIVE METHODS
POLICY REFORMS
ANALYTICAL TOOLS
ECONOMIC THEORY
POLICY RESEARCH
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
POLITICAL INTERESTS
SCENARIOS
SOCIAL IMPACT
OPERATIONAL WORK
NATIONAL DEBATE
INFORMANT INTERVIEWS
POLICY OPTIONS
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPER
DATA LIMITATIONS
INCOME
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
POVERTY REDUCTION
COMPENSATION MEASURES
POLICY PURPOSES
DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS
COUNTRY WORK
NATIONAL POLICY DEBATE
POLICY DECISIONS
GOVERNMENT POLICY
CIVIL SOCIETY
PUBLIC DEBATE
OIL PRICE
REFORM IMPLEMENTATION
GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS
FUEL PRICES
SAFETY NETS
POVERTY GROUP
SOCIAL GROUPS
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS
CAPACITY BUILDING
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT
TRANSPARENCY
DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
EVALUATION SYSTEMS
DIRECT CONSULTATION
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
ANALYTICAL METHODS
COUNTRY OWNERSHIP
REFORM PACKAGE
OPERATIONAL POLICY
COUNTRY TEAM
POLICY OUTCOMES
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
POLICY CONTEXT
PRICE INCREASES
DATA SOURCES
CONFIDENCE
POLITICAL ECONOMY RISKS
POLICY DIALOGUE
POLICY DESIGN
POLICY ANALYSIS
POLICY REFORM
ALLOCATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
COUNTRY STAKEHOLDERS
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
POLICY CHANGE
SERVICE DELIVERY
DATA COLLECTION
POLITICAL LEADERS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC IMPACTS
ANALYTICAL APPROACH
COUNTRY CIRCUMSTANCES
FOCUS GROUP
POLICY PROCESSES
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLICY AREAS
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
REFORM EFFORTS
COUNTRY CAPACITY
NATIONAL POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES
SOCIAL IMPACTS
PRICE INCREASE
CHOICE OF TOOLS
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS
POLICY FORMULATION
LOCAL POLICY
COUNTRY RISKS
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT NETWORK
SOCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT
POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL
SECTOR WORK
MACROECONOMIC REFORMS
ALTERNATIVE POLICY
PENSIONS
SOCIAL PROTECTION
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
POLICY RESPONSES
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
POLICY MAKERS
PUBLIC POLICIES
INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS
CLIMATE
REFORM EFFECTIVENESS
COUNTRY CONDITIONS
PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL
POVERTY IMPACT
REFORM IMPACTS
QUALITATIVE DATA
SOCIAL EFFECTS OF POLICY REFORM
INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT
LEADERSHIP
POVERTY IMPACTS
POLICY CHOICES
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
ECONOMIC POLICY
MEDIA
POLITICAL ECONOMY
REFORM PROGRAM
POLICY CHOICE
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS
DISTRIBUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES
ENERGY PRICES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3126Abstract
The synthesis report concerns to go beyond a summary of the country studies to provide lessons and recommendations on how to further improve Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) effectiveness. To do so, it draws on findings from country case studies, the literature and recent internal Bank reviews (World Bank 2006, 2008) on PSIA. The synthesis is structured in three parts. Section two reviews the role of PSIA in country work drawing on internal guidance from the Bank and the wider literature. It introduces the PSIA framework and the main elements of an effective PSIA. Section two ends with a presentation of the review framework and the approach to sampling and methodology for the country studies. Section three presents the bulk of the review findings and lessons learned with a focus on lessons for embedding PSIA into country processes. Section four addresses the future of PSIA with recommendations aimed at: (i) improving the influence that PSIA has on policy and planning processes in-country, and (ii) ensuring that it is applied more routinely by partner governments and Bank programs.Date
2009-05-01Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/3126http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3126
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Analyzing the Effects of Policy
 Reforms on the Poor : An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of
 World Bank Support to Poverty and Social Impact AnalysesIndependent Evaluation Group (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-03-19)The current global financial and
 economic crises are likely to put enormous pressure on
 governments to respond with immediate measures and to
 undertake far-reaching reforms in the medium term, requiring
 a substantial increase in donor support. To protect the poor
 and enhance benefits to them, key policy reforms will need
 to be underpinned by systematic analysis of their expected
 poverty and social impacts. The World Bank's experience
 to date with the Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA)
 approach provides useful lessons for addressing these
 issues. Overall, implementation of the PSIA approach has had
 considerable limitations. There have been tensions between
 the various operational objectives assigned to PSIAs. The
 tensions concern inconsistencies between informing country
 and Bank policy decisions in a timely way and building
 country analytic capacity. PSIAs have had limited ownership
 by Bank staff and managers and have often not been
 effectively integrated into country assistance programs.
 Quality assurance, monitoring, and evaluation of the overall
 effectiveness of PSIAs have been weak. To improve
 PSIAs' effectiveness, this evaluation recommends that
 the Bank take measures to ensure that staff fully
 understands what the PSIA approach is and when to use it,
 clarify the operational objectives of each PSIA, and ensure
 that the approach and timeline adopted are aligned with
 those objectives. Quality assurance mechanisms should be
 strengthened to ensure that PSIAs are designed to achieve
 the intended effects.
-
The Political Economy of Policy Reform : Issues and Implications for Policy Dialogue and Development OperationsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-11)This study addresses the political economy of sector reforms. Sustainable reform processes which improve equity, efficiency and effectiveness in key economic and social sectors are often important elements of national poverty reduction strategies in low- and middle-income countries. For international development agencies wishing to engage in these processes, understanding the significance of power relations within the sector, vested interests, and the links to national political processes can be critical to being an effective actor in policy dialogue. This study explores these issues through the analysis of case studies of World Bank engagement in two areas: agricultural liberalization, and public-private partnerships in water supply and sanitation. The objectives of the study are twofold: (a) to analyze the political economy of reform by looking at stakeholder interests, incentives, institutions, risks, opportunities, and processes from a social analysis perspective; and (b) to illustrate 'what works, why and how' for a better understanding and management of political economy issues in the design and implementation of reforms and development operations. The study draws on operational experiences to inductively develop a conceptual framework that offers an innovative way to look at the political economy of policy reforms. The study presents a solid basis for a future program of work which can address these issues.
-
Nicaragua : Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Process and Arrangements under the Poverty Reduction and Growth FacilityOperations Evaluation Department (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-09-17)The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank introduced the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) process in 1999 to strengthen the poverty alleviation focus of their assistance to low-income countries. This report reviews Nicaragua s experience with the PRSP process, focusing on the effectiveness of IMF and World Bank support to the process and the extent to which the two institutions lending and non-lending activities in the country are aligned to the objectives of the PRSP approach. The report is structured as follows: section B provides background on poverty, the political and economic context, and history of national strategies in Nicaragua. Section C analyzes the PRSP process focusing on application of underlying principles, including through formulation and implementation processes. Section D evaluates the support of the IMF through the PRGF. Section E assesses the support of the World Bank to the PRSP process. Section V summarizes the main findings and attempts to draw lessons for the PRSP process and for Bank and Fund operations.