Author(s)
Matthew W. Crocker Saarland UniversityContributor(s)
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.222.8765http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/%7Ejudith/poster_cuny_2011.pdf
Abstract
1) Listeners integrate information from the visual context, the linguistic context, and their world knowledge into comprehension: When hearing the restrictive verb eat, for instance, they look rapidly and predictively to edible objects in visual scenes (Altman & Kamide, 1999). This mechanism enables word learning in adults (word learning based on verbal constraints, WLVC, Köhne & Crocker, 2010). 2) Language novices exploit their experiences with co-occurring visual referents and novel words to learn word meanings (cross-situational word learning, CSWL, Yu & Smith, 2007). 3) These mechanisms interact in a beneficial way in second language word learning when they are applicable in a complementary way (Köhne & Crocker, 2010). Which cue dominates when WLVC and CSWL are in conflict? � Experiment 1 What is the nature of CSWL and WLVC? IsDate
2012-05-08Type
textIdentifier
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.222.8765http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.222.8765