• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) Speeches/Conference Papers (150)

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Robin H
Ice Of Educaional Re
Contributor(s)
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Keywords
Processes
Protocol Analysis
Spreadsheets

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/2455106
Online Access
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.831.8444
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED392421.pdf
Abstract
This paper details a study of knowledge-building activities in the domain of computer software. Thirty-six adults--evenly split among beginning, intermediate, and advanced knowledge levels--were videotaped while they attempted to learn a common spreadsheet package. Subjects were asked to think aloud while learning. Each knowledge building activity was given a score based on how much was learned and how much time was gained or lost. Tabulations revealed that directed search, trial and error, and careful observation had the strongest impact on learning; pace of learning and systematic testing had a more moderate effect. From these results, a list is drawn of suggestions for educators who are trying to learn software, including making searches for help more focused instead of wasting time with frantic random keystrokes. Three tables summarize the data. (Contains 18 references.) (BEW) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
Date
2016-09-02
Type
text
Identifier
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.831.8444
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.831.8444
Copyright/License
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.