Author(s)
World Bank GroupKeywords
POVERTY PROFILERURAL WORKFORCE
FARMER ASSOCIATIONS
AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT
RURAL AREAS
RURAL POPULATION
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION
POVERTY DYNAMICS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
CROP PRODUCTION
NATIONAL POVERTY
CONFLICT
LIVESTOCK OWNERSHIP
RURAL GROWTH
POOR
PUBLIC SPENDING
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
REMOTE AREAS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POOR COUNTRIES
RURAL HOUSEHOLD
RURAL POLICY
COMMERCIAL BANK
FOOD CROP PRODUCTION
LAND SIZE
COMMERCIAL BANKS
FOOD CROPS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
LAND SUPPLY
EXTREME VULNERABILITY
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
DEATH
POOR HEALTH
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
RURAL
CROPLAND
HUMAN HEALTH
HUMAN CAPITAL FORMATION
POVERTY CHARACTERISTICS
SAFETY NETS
POVERTY GAP
POVERTY REDUCTION IMPACT
FARM PRODUCTIVITY
INSURANCE
POVERTY
FOOD CONSUMPTION
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY
RURAL POOR
ACCESS TO IRRIGATION
HUMAN RIGHTS
LAND MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMS
POVERTY RATES
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
HUMAN CAPITAL
TRANSFER PROGRAMS
SANITATION
RURAL POPULATIONS
POLITICAL FEASIBILITY
INCOME
FOOD INSECURITY
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
POVERTY MEASUREMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES
NATIONAL POVERTY LINE
REMOTE RURAL AREAS
CASH TRANSFERS
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
FOOD POLICY
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
POOR PEOPLE
IMPACT OF SHOCKS
SOCIAL SECURITY
SUSTAINABLE POVERTY REDUCTION
CLIMATE CHANGE
ACCESS TO MARKETS
RURAL ECONOMY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
POVERTY POVERTY
FOOD SECURITY
POVERTY REDUCTION
ILLITERACY
ACCESS TO SERVICES
RURAL LIVELIHOODS
RURAL SECTOR
LAND DEGRADATION
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
COUNTERFACTUAL
POVERTY INCIDENCE
HOUSEHOLD FOOD SECURITY
POVERTY STATUS
INEQUALITY
RURAL COMMUNITIES
FARMLAND
CHEAPER FOOD
REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICIES
LACK OF INFORMATION
TRANSFERS
IMPACT ON POVERTY
SUBSISTENCE CROPS
FOOD ITEMS
POOR FARMERS
AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE
TRANSACTION COSTS
MALNUTRITION
FAMINE
RURAL AREA
RISKS
IRRIGATION
DRINKING WATER
CHRONIC MALNUTRITION
RURAL EXODUS
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE
EXTREME POVERTY
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
FARMERS
STRUCTURAL REFORMS
TARGETING
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC POLICIES
CHILD MORTALITY
FOOD SUPPLY
RURAL WORKERS
CALORIC INTAKE
MEASURES
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
AGRICULTURAL GROWTH
CLIMATIC CHANGE
CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
FOOD PRICE
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
POVERTY IMPACT
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION
RURAL PUBLIC
EXTREMELY POOR HOUSEHOLDS
FARMING COMMUNITIES
POOR RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
FOOD PRICES
AGRICULTURAL YIELDS
POVERTY LINE
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
DROUGHT
POVERTY MAPS
RURAL ACTIVITIES
SAVINGS
AGRICULTURAL LAND
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
PUBLIC WORKS
MEANS TESTING
NUTRITION
RURAL POVERTY
AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION
FARM ACTIVITIES
FOOD CROP
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23114Abstract
This systematic country diagnosis (SCD) for Chad aims to identify how to achieve the twin goals of ending poverty and improving shared prosperity. It acknowledges both: (i) the need for selectivity in pro-poor interventions, and (ii) the inherent difficulty to do so given the many competing binding reasons for poverty. Selectivity means the identification of principal opportunities for sustainable poverty reduction in the next 15 years, as well as the identification of binding constraints to reaping such opportunities. Selectivity also implies making trade-offs between immediate and longer term objectives, with priority given to the identification of poverty reduction opportunities which will: (i) deliver the highest possible results before 2030, and (ii) not undermine prospects for poverty reduction and shared prosperity beyond 2030. The analysis presented in the SCD draws on a variety of information sources. These include domestic statistics and reports, evaluations by the country’s development partners, original research conducted by the World Bank team, and consultations held in N’Djamena with nongovernmental organizations and the private sector. Reaping poverty reduction opportunities will require addressing a selected number of binding constraints.Date
2015-11-20Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/23114http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23114
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Poverty Focus of Country ProgramsIndependent Evaluation Group (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-07)The World Bank Group in 2013 made the elimination of extreme poverty by 2030 a central institutional focus and purpose. This evaluation examines how, and how well, the Bank Group has focused its support on poverty reduction over the past decade, and what lessons to draw from this moving forward. The lessons aim to strengthen the Bank’s country diagnostics, improve the design of country strategies, and build greater learning opportunities from program experience. Using country case studies, surveys, focus group meetings, systematic reviews of Bank products, and other instruments, the evaluation examines the consistency of poverty focus in each of four links in a causal chain: data, diagnostics, strategy formulation, and strategy implementation through lending and nonlending instruments. It reviews the adequacy of the information base and usefulness of the analytical underpinnings that support country strategy formulation and implementation. It also evaluates the consistency of the poverty focus throughout the evaluation chain and the strength and weakness of feedback loops.
-
Botswana Poverty AssessmentWorld Bank Group (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-01-07)Living conditions of Botswana have improved over the past decade and poverty has reduced significantly. This decrease was accompanied by a considerable decline in both depth and severity of poverty, indicating that consumption has improved among the poor. While rural areas led the poverty reduction, the share of the poor living in urban areas has increased. Botswana’s progress toward reduction of extreme poverty and inequality was among the world’s strongest in the second half of 2000s. During this period, the economic growth has been strongly pro-poor. Botswana is one of the top performers in Africa when measured by annual consumption distribution growth for the bottom 40 percentile. However, despite these noteworthy improvements, inequality remains high. The study concludes that with adequate macro and social policies, and a strong focus on improving equity, Botswana has a historical opportunity to build on recent achievements and move towards eradicating extreme poverty within one generation. The analyses was conducted in close collaboration with the Statistics Botswana, utilizing the data generated through the nationally representative households income and expenditure surveys conducted by Statistics Botswana in 2002/2003 and 2009/2010. The report benefited greatly from the leadership by the Poverty Eradication Unit.
-
Rural Transport : Improving its Contribution to Growth and Poverty Reduction in Sub-Saharan AfricaBanjo, George; Gordon, Henry; Riverson, John (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-04-15)Poverty reduction is a long-standing development objective of many developing countries and their aid donors, including the World Bank. To achieve this goal, these countries and organizations have sought to improve smallholder agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as part of a broader rural development agenda aimed at providing a minimal basket of goods and services in rural areas to satisfy basic human needs. These goods and services include not only food, health care, and education, but also infrastructure. As a result, rural transport remains a constraint to increasing agricultural productivity, achieving rural growth, and thus alleviating rural poverty. The first major finding of the review of rural transport theory and practice is that many of the approaches needed to improve the impact of rural transport interventions on poverty reduction are known, particularly from the work of the Rural Travel and Transport Program (RTTP) of Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program (SSATP). Unfortunately, many of the recommended approaches remain untested within Sub-Saharan Africa beyond the pilot scale, notwithstanding their influence on rural transport policy and project design in other operational regions of the Bank. For SSA, these are missed opportunities. Even where SSA countries have applied these approaches, institutional and financial sustainability and scaling up local successes remain significant challenges for both their agriculture and transport sectors. The second key finding is that rural households are rarely the point of focus in the design of rural transport interventions in SSA, even though a methodology to allow this focus has been developed and successfully tested in several pilot projects since the 1980s, the result is that the transport needs of rural households continue to be analyzed and understood by means of an indirect assessment of those needs, which means that most projects have a less than desirable impact on improving the rural access and mobility situation of such households.