• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Climate Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Climate Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Assessing species vulnerability to climate change

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Pacifici, Michela
Foden, Wendy B
Visconti, Piero
Watson, James E. M
Butchart, Stuart H. M
Kovacs, Kit M
Scheffers, Brett R
Hole, David G
Martin, Tara G
Akcakaya, H. Resit
Corlett, Richard T
Huntley, Brian
Bickford, David
Carr, Jamie A
Hoffmann, Ary A
Midgley, Guy F
Pearce-Kelly, Paul
Pearson, Richard G
Williams, Stephen E
Willis, Stephen G
Young, Bruce
Rondinini, Carlo
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/246901
Online Access
http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:355261
Abstract
The effects of climate change on biodiversity are increasingly well documented, and many methods have been developed to assess species' vulnerability to climatic changes, both ongoing and projected in the coming decades. To minimize global biodiversity losses, conservationists need to identify those species that are likely to be most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. In this Review, we summarize different currencies used for assessing species' climate change vulnerability. We describe three main approaches used to derive these currencies (correlative, mechanistic and trait-based), and their associated data requirements, spatial and temporal scales of application and modelling methods. We identify strengths and weaknesses of the approaches and highlight the sources of uncertainty inherent in each method that limit projection reliability. Finally, we provide guidance for conservation practitioners in selecting the most appropriate approach(es) for their planning needs and highlight priority areas for further assessments.
Date
2015-02-25
Type
Journal Article
Identifier
oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:355261
http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:355261
Collections
Climate Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.