The 1939 Dickinson-Belskie Birth Series Sculptures: The Rise of Modern Visions of Pregnancy, the Roots of Modern Pro-Life Imagery, and Dr. Dickinson’s Religious Case for Abortion
Author(s)
Holz, RoseKeywords
Bioethics and Medical EthicsCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Health Information Technology
Health Policy
History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology
Maternal and Child Health
Medical Education
Medical Humanities
Medicine and Health
Medicine and Health Sciences
Other Medicine and Health Sciences
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Public Health
Public Health Education and Promotion
Science and Technology Policy
Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance
Women's Studies
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/womenstudiespapers/9http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=womenstudiespapers
Abstract
This multidisciplinary essay examines the hugely influential—yet surprisingly overlooked—Birth Series sculptures. Created in 1939 by Dr. Robert L. Dickinson (obstetrician-gynecologist and leader of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America) and sculptor Abram Belskie, they illustrate the process of human development from fertilization through delivery. First displayed at the 1939–1940 World’s Fair in New York City, they were reproduced in a variety of forms and sent out across the United States and overseas. Hardly a brief fad, their popularity persisted into the 1980s. This essay has four purposes. First, it tells the stories of Dickinson and Belskie to appreciate their contributions as artists to twentieth-century medical knowledge. Second, it demonstrates that the sculptures serve as the missing link in the rise of modern twentieth-century visions of pregnancy, decades before Lennart Nilsson’s much-heralded photographs in Time magazine in the 1960s. Third, it assesses the uniqueness of the visual story the Birth Series told, in that it depicted in utero development as a romantic tale that began with the union of sperm and egg and unfolded to reveal the birth of a precious child—imagery that would later become the hallmarks of the modern pro-life movement. Fourth, it addresses the conundrum of Dickinson’s intent. A deeply religious man, Dickinson hardly intended to make a visual case against abortion. Rather, he believed firmly in the necessity of its practice, not despite his religious views but because of them. He then set out to make the religious case for contraception and abortion.Date
2017-01-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:digitalcommons.unl.edu:womenstudiespapers-1010http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/womenstudiespapers/9
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=womenstudiespapers
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Better Outcomes through Health Reforms in the Russian Federation : The Challenge in 2008 and BeyondMarquez, Patricio V. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-02)The purpose of this discussion paper is
 to discuss selected health challenges in the Russian
 Federation, focusing on outcomes, expenditures and options
 for policy and institutional reforms in the health care
 system. The areas covered in the paper draw on recent
 studies and reports, and take into account lessons derived
 from the implementation of the World Bank-funded Health
 Reform Implementation Project (HRIP) at the federal level
 and in the Chuvash Republic and the Voronezh Oblast-the
 pilot regions of the project, over the 2005-2007 period.
-
Turkey on the Way of Universal Health Coverage through the Health Transformation Program (2003-13)Aran, Meltem; Rokx, Claudia; Bump, Jesse; Celik, Yusuf; Sparkes, Susan; Tatar, Mehtap (World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2014-12-31)Beginning in 2003, Turkey initiated a
 series of reforms under the Health Transformation Program
 (HTP) that over the past decade have led to the achievement
 of universal health coverage (UHC). The progress of Turkey s
 health system has few if any parallels in scope and
 speed. Before the reforms, Turkey s aggregate health
 indicators lagged behind those of OECD member states and
 other middle-income countries. The health financing system
 was fragmented, with four separate insurance schemes and a
 Green Card program for the poor, each with distinct
 benefits packages and access rules. Both the Ministry of
 Labor and Social Security and Ministry of Health (MoH) were
 providers and financiers of the health system, and four
 different ministries were directly involved in public health
 care delivery. Turkey s reform efforts have impacted
 virtually all aspects of the country s health system and
 have resulted in the rapid expansion of the proportion of
 the population covered and of the services to which they are
 entitled. At the same time, financial protection has
 improved. For example, (i) insurance coverage increased from
 64 to 98 percent between 2002 and 2012; (ii) the share of
 pregnant women having four antenatal care visits increased
 from 54 to 82 percent between 2003 and 2010; and (iii)
 citizen satisfaction with health services increased from
 39.5 to 75.9 percent between 2003 and 2011. Despite dramatic
 improvements there is still space for Turkey to continue to
 improve its citizens health outcomes, and challenges lie
 ahead for improving services beyond primary care. The main
 criticism to reform has so far come from health sector
 workers; the future sustainability of reform will rely not
 only on continued fiscal support to the health sector but
 also the maintenence of service provider satisfaction.
-
Who pays? Out-of-Pocket Health Spending and Equity Implications in the Middle East and North AfricaElgazzar, Heba; Arfa, Chokri; Salti, Nisreen; Majbouri, Mehdi; Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad; Raad, Firas; Chaaban, Jad; Fesharaki, Sanaz; Mataria, Awad (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-29)Ensuring affordable, effective health care and financial protection against the adverse effects of household out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditures represents an important policy objective in most countries, yet relatively little evidence exists regarding patterns and implications of household health expenditures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This paper examines the scope of out-of-pocket expenditures and their implications on living standards and policy reforms in six MENA countries including Yemen, the West Bank and Gaza, Egypt, Iran, Tunisia, and Lebanon. Results show that OOP payments represent a relatively high share of total national health care financing at 49 percent on average in the MENA region as of 2006. Households pay an average of 6 percent of their total household expenditure on health. Most of this OOP is spent on medications, doctor visits and diagnostic services. Lower-income and rural households generally face greater financial risk; yet this is reversed where private health services are utilized and paid for more frequently by higher-income groups. 7 to 13 percent of households face particularly high OOP payments, or catastrophic expenditures equal to at least 10 percent of household spending. Poverty rates tend to increase by up to 20 percent after health care spending is accounted for. Results are discussed in light of ongoing policy efforts to strengthen social protection for health care.