Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCallahan, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T11:21:24Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T11:21:24Z
dc.date.created2017-09-25 10:04
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifieroai:open-archive.highwire.org:medethics:41/1/68
dc.identifierhttp://jme.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/41/1/68
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102384
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/249492
dc.description.abstractMuch of my work in bioethics over the years has been throwing off ethics as pursued in the analytical tradition. I believe the field should steer clear of the rigid style of hyper-rationalist ethics and a reduction of ethics to a search for rules and principles. It should be open to a full range of influence, in style and substance, of literature, history and the social sciences. It should take in the full range of human life, individual and social.
dc.format.mediumtext/html
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group Ltd
dc.rightsCopyright (C) 2015, Institute of Medical Ethics
dc.subjectJME40: Good medical ethics
dc.titleWhat is it to do good ethics?
dc.typeTEXT
ge.collectioncodeBB
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:11377205
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/11377205
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-09-25 10:04
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid148650
ge.oai.repositoryid1568
ge.oai.setnameHighWire Press
ge.oai.setnameBMJ Publishing Group Ltd
ge.oai.setnameJournal of Medical Ethics vol. 41 issue 1
ge.oai.setspecHighWire
ge.oai.setspecBMJ-PG
ge.oai.setspecmedethics:41:1
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://jme.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/41/1/68
ge.linkhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102384


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record