• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Health Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Health Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Consenting options for posthumous organ donation: presumed consent and incentives are not favored

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Hammami Muhammad M
Abdulhameed Hunaida M
Concepcion Kristine A
Eissa Abdullah
Hammami Sumaya
Amer Hala
Ahmed Abdelraheem
Al-Gaai Eman
Keywords
Organ donation
Islamic ethics
Preference
Norm perception
Mandated choice
Presumed consent
Informed consent
Medical incentives
Financial incentive
Gender difference
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medicine
R
DOAJ:Medicine (General)
DOAJ:Health Sciences
Ethics
BJ1-1725
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
B
DOAJ:Philosophy
DOAJ:Philosophy and Religion
Medical philosophy. Medical ethics
R723-726
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/249986
Online Access
https://doaj.org/article/afd9ec9e531f4cb089e3fa18d63d6275
Abstract
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Posthumous organ procurement is hindered by the consenting process. Several consenting systems have been proposed. There is limited information on public relative attitudes towards various consenting systems, especially in Middle Eastern/Islamic countries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We surveyed 698 Saudi Adults attending outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital. Preference and perception of norm regarding consenting options for posthumous organ donation were explored. Participants ranked (1, most agreeable) the following, randomly-presented, options from 1 to 11: no-organ-donation, presumed consent, informed consent by donor-only, informed consent by donor-or-surrogate, and mandatory choice; the last three options ± medical or financial incentive.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean(SD) age was 32(9) year, 27% were males, 50% were patients’ companions, 60% had ≥ college education, and 20% and 32%, respectively, knew an organ donor or recipient. Mandated choice was among the top three choices for preference of 54% of respondents, with an overall median[25%,75%] ranking score of 3[2,6], and was preferred over donor-or-surrogate informed consent (4[2,7], p < 0.001), donor-only informed consent (5[3,7], p < 0.001), and presumed consent (7[3,10], p < 0.001). The addition of a financial or medical incentive, respectively, reduced ranking of mandated choice to 7[4,9], p < 0.001, and 5[3,8], p < 0.001; for donor-or-surrogate informed consent to 7[5,9], p < 0.001, and 5[3,7], p = 0.004; and for donor-only informed consent to 8[6,10], p < 0.001, and 5[3,7], p = 0.56. Distribution of ranking score of perception of norm and preference were similar except for no-organ donation (11[7,11] <it>vs.</it> 11[6,11], respectively, p = 0.002). Compared to females, males more perceived donor-or-surrogate informed consent as the norm (3[1,6] <it>vs.</it> 5[3,7], p < 0.001), more preferred mandated choice with financial incentive option (6[3,8] <it>vs.</it> 8[4,9], p < 0.001), and less preferred mandated choice with medical incentive option (7[4,9] <it>vs.</it> 5[2,7], p < 0.001). There was no association between consenting options ranking scores and age, health status, education level, or knowing an organ donor or recipient.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We conclude that: 1) most respondents were in favor of posthumous organ donation, 2) mandated choice system was the most preferred and presumed consent system was the least preferred, 3) there was no difference between preference and perception of norm in consenting systems ranking, and 4) financial (especially in females) and medical (especially in males) incentives reduced preference.</p>
Date
2012-11-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:doaj.org/article:afd9ec9e531f4cb089e3fa18d63d6275
10.1186/1472-6939-13-32
1472-6939
https://doaj.org/article/afd9ec9e531f4cb089e3fa18d63d6275
Collections
Health Ethics
Islamic Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics
Gender and Theology
Philosophical Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.