Ethics of care and the ethics of justice in ethical decision making in the health team
Author(s)
Botes, AnnatjieKeywords
Medical ethicsRight to health care
Health services administration - Moral and ethical aspects
Medical policy
Power over life and death
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10210/1255Abstract
Inaugural lecture--Dept. of Nursing, Rand Afrikaans University, 27 August 1997From case studies it appears that nurses and doctors as central agents in ethical decision making in the health team, approach ethical problems from two different and opposing perspectives. The way in which doctors make ethical decisions is associated with Kohlberg's (1981) ethics of justice, while the ethical decisions made by nurses are associated with Gilligan's (1982) ethics of care. There is little or no interaction between the different disciplines in the health team when ethical decisions are made. Such a situation leads to ineffective ethical decision making since it involves conflict and unnecessary physical and mental suffering with accompanying financial implications. A possible solution to this problem is the complementary use of the ethics of justice and the ethics of care in ethical decision making in the health team. The way in which the two ethical perspectives are used complementary to one another is through discourse which involves a wider rationality model and ethics of virtues are used. This solution is found in an investigation into the nature of the two ethical perspectives. Such a solution makes interaction possible, and probably also more effective ethical decision making without expecting significant paradigm changes in the two disciplines.
Date
2008-10-20Type
InauguralIdentifier
oai:uj:14885oai:uj:14885
http://hdl.handle.net/10210/1255
Copyright/License
University of JohannesburgCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.