Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoertzen, Melissa
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-29T00:48:25Z
dc.date.available2019-10-29T00:48:25Z
dc.date.created2018-09-05 01:04
dc.date.issued2016-03-15
dc.identifieroai:ejournals.library.ualberta.ca:article/25982
dc.identifierhttp://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/25982
dc.identifier10.18438/B8233J
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/2542736
dc.description.abstractA Review of: Priddle, C., & McCann, L. (2015). Off-site storage and special collections: A study in use and impact in ARL libraries in the United States. College & Research Libraries, 76(5), 652-670. doi:10.5860/crl.76.5.652 Abstract Objective – To measure the use of off-site storage for special collections materials and to examine how this use impacts core special collections activities. Design – Survey questionnaire containing both structured and open ended questions. Follow-up interviews were also conducted. Setting – Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member institutions in the United States of America. Subjects – 108 directors of special collections. Methods – Participants were recruited via email; contact information was compiled through professional directories, web searches, and referrals from professionals at ARL member libraries. The survey was sent out on October 31, 2013, and two reminder emails were distributed before it closed three weeks later. The survey was created and distributed using Qualtrics, a research software that supports online data collection and analysis. All results were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Qualtrics. Main Results – The final response rate was 58% (63 out of 108). The majority (51 participants, or 81%) reported use of off-site storage for library collections. Of this group, 91% (47 out of 51) house a variety of special collections in off-site storage. The criteria most frequently utilized to designate these materials to off-site storage are use (87%), size (66%), format (60%), and value (57%). The authors found that special collections directors are most likely to send materials to off-site storage facilities that are established and in use by other departments at their home institution; access to established workflows, especially those linked to transit and delivery, and space for expanding collections are benefits. In regard to core special collections activities, results indicated that public service was most impacted by off-site storage. The authors discussed challenges related to patron use and satisfaction. In regard to management and processing, directors faced challenges using the same level of staff to maintain two locations instead of one. Also, the integration of new workflows required additional oversight to ensure adequate control at all points of process. Static staffing levels and increased levels of responsibility impacted preservation and conservation activities as well. A central concern was the handling of materials by facility staff not trained as special collections professionals. In regard to the facilities themselves, a general concern was that commercial warehouses do not always provide the kind of environmental control systems recommended for storage of special collections materials. Of the total sample group, 12 participants (19%) said their institution does not use off-site storage for special collections. When asked if this may occur in the future, four directors (33%) said they anticipate off-site storage use within the next five years. Lack of space was listed as the primary motivation. Conclusion – Study findings provide evidence for what was previously known anecdotally: planning, coordinating, and managing off-site storage is a significant professional responsibility that will only grow in the future. As primary resources are integrated into research, teaching, and learning activities, the acquisition of special collections materials will continue to grow. Discussions regarding off-site storage workflows and strategic planning will continue as professionals seek compromises that meet the unique needs of acquisition, preservation, and public service.
dc.format.mediumtext/html
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Alberta Learning Services
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/25982/20169
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/25982/20222
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2016 Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
dc.sourceEvidence Based Library and Information Practice; Vol 11, No 1 (2016); 70-72
dc.subjectevidence summary
dc.titleThe Impact of Off-Site Storage on Core Special Collections Activities
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
ge.collectioncodeOAIDATA
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:15194565
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/15194565
ge.lastmodificationdate2018-09-05 01:04
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid149801
ge.oai.repositoryid1789
ge.oai.setnameEvidence Summaries
ge.oai.setspecEBLIP:ES
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/25982


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record