Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research.
Author(s)
Johnsson, LinusHelgesson, Gert
Rafnar, Thorunn
Halldorsdottir, Ingibjorg
Chia, Kee-Seng
Eriksson, Stefan
Hansson, Mats G
Keywords
AltruismAttitudes
Donors
Health
Health Care
Regulation
Research
Surveys
Trust
Genetics, Molecular Biology and Microbiology
Genetics and Human Ancestry
Information Science Ethics
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/515941Abstract
In the debate on biobank regulation, arguments often draw upon findings in surveys on public attitudes. However, surveys on willingness to participate in research may not always predict actual participation rates. We compared hypothetical willingness as estimated in 11 surveys conducted in Sweden, Iceland, United Kingdom, Ireland, United States and Singapore to factual participation rates in 12 biobank studies. Studies were matched by country and approximate time frame. Of 22 pairwise comparisons, 12 suggest that factual willingness to participate in biobank research is greater than hypothetical, six indicate the converse relationship, and four are inconclusive. Factual donors, in particular when recruited in health care or otherwise face-to-face with the researcher, are possibly motivated by factors that are less influential in a hypothetical context, such as altruism, trust, and sense of duty. The value of surveys in assessing factual willingness may thus be limited.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.106
Date
2011-07-12Identifier
oai::10822/5159411476-5438
10.1038/ejhg.2010.106
European journal of human genetics : EJHG 2010 Nov; 18(11): 1261-4
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/515941