Keywords
EthicsHealth Care Professionals
Technology
organizational culture
Latour
Levinas
moral literacy
nurses
Ethics
Technology
Moral literacy
Latour
Levinas
Organization
Nurses
Health care
Professionals
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://forskning.ruc.dk/da/publications/0b9aecef-1fa9-4acc-95d1-78ca931b8c86https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.938672
http://hdl.handle.net/1800/0b9aecef-1fa9-4acc-95d1-78ca931b8c86
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.938672
Abstract
Many different professionals play a key role in maintaining welfare in a welfare society. These professionals engage in moral judgements when using (new) technologies. In doing so, they achieve that radical responsibility towards the other that Levinas describes as being at the very core of ethics. Also, professionals try to assess the possible consequences of the involvement of specific technologies and adjust their actions in order to ensure ethical responsibility. Thus, ethics is necessary in order to obtain and sustain one's professionalism. This presents care institutions with the challenge to design work processes and technology work in ways that include a sense of ‘the Other’ and make moral judgement an indispensable part of professional competence in technology. This article provides new understandings of the way ethics are involved in care institutions. Nurses’ moral judgements are sophisticated with regard to ethical perspectives. In hospitals, nurses combine Latour's notion of symmetry in human/technology relations with an ethics implying ethical priority to human beings over other beings. This combination of ethics is not only sophisticated; it is also paradoxical, as it puts together mutually contradictory ethics. Instead of causing moral confusion, this ethical paradox is employed to produce a particularly refined notion of care situations, allowing nurses’ care to include patients and technology alike.Many different professionals play a key role in maintaining welfare in a welfare society. These professionals engage in moral judgements when using (new) technologies. In doing so, they achieve that radical responsibility towards the other that Levinas describes as being at the very core of ethics. Also, professionals try to assess the possible consequences of the involvement of specific technologies and adjust their actions in order to ensure ethical responsibility. Thus, ethics is necessary in order to obtain and sustain one's professionalism. This presents care institutions with the challenge to design work processes and technology work in ways that include a sense of ‘the Other’ and make moral judgement an indispensable part of professional competence in technology. This article provides new understandings of the way ethics are involved in care institutions. Nurses’ moral judgements are sophisticated with regard to ethical perspectives. In hospitals, nurses combine Latour's notion of symmetry in human/technology relations with an ethics implying ethical priority to human beings over other beings. This combination of ethics is not only sophisticated; it is also paradoxical, as it puts together mutually contradictory ethics. Instead of causing moral confusion, this ethical paradox is employed to produce a particularly refined notion of care situations, allowing nurses’ care to include patients and technology alike
Date
2014-09-04Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/0b9aecef-1fa9-4acc-95d1-78ca931b8c86https://forskning.ruc.dk/da/publications/0b9aecef-1fa9-4acc-95d1-78ca931b8c86
https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.938672
http://hdl.handle.net/1800/0b9aecef-1fa9-4acc-95d1-78ca931b8c86
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.938672