Living with ethical dilemmas : the ethical reasoning of surgeons and nurses in surgical units
Author(s)
Torjuul, KirstiKeywords
VDP::Medisinske fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Medisinsk/odontologisk etikk, atferdsfag, historie: 805VDP::Medisinske fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808
VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Medical/dental ethics, behavioural sciences, history: 805
VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Nursing science: 808
empirical research report
ethical dilemmas
ethics
medical ethics
narrative interviews
nursing ethics
phenomenological hermeneutics
surgical care
surgery
etiske dilemma
narrative intervjuer
fenomenologisk hermeneutisk metode
medisinsk etikk
sykepleieetikk
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/2468Abstract
Papers number 3 and 4 of the thesis are not available in Munin due to publishers' restrictions:
 <br>3. Torjuul K, Sørlie V (2006): «Nursing is different than medicine: ethical difficulties in the process of care in surgical units», Journal of Advanced Nursing 56 (4):404-413 (Blackwell). Available at <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04013.x>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04013.x</a>
 <br>4. Torjuul K, Elstad I, Sørlie V (2007): «Compassion and responsibility in surgical care», Nursing Ethics 14(4):522-534 (Sage). Available at <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733007077886>http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733007077886</a>The aim of this thesis is to illuminate surgeons’ and nurses’ experiences of living with ethical dilemmas in their work. The thesis comprises the kinds of ethical dilemmas experienced from the practitioners’ own point of view, and explores their way of reasoning, deliberating and acting in ethically difficult situations, including the meaning they assign to their experiences.
 The data collection consists of open-ended narrative interviews with ten surgeons and ten registered nurses at a university hospital in Norway. The transcribed interview texts were subjected to a phenomenological hermeneutical interpretation.
 <br>The main ethical dilemmas experienced by surgeons and nurses concerned the respecting
 patients’ right to decide their own treatment and care, and act accordingly. Taking appropriate actions to rescue and sustain patients’ lives, and maintain patients’ hopes and efforts to fight
 the disease were important concerns for surgeons and nurses. Being responsible for particular patients in life threatening and decisive circumstances made profound impressions on surgeons and nurses and challenged their outlook on life as well as their professional conduct.
 <br>Situations when ethical dilemmas occur are characterized by complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity about the correct and best thing to do and what constitutes an ethically satisfying solution to the problem. Surgeons and nurses emphasized the importance of collegial recognition and support in order to live with the responsibility and emotional burden of
 experiencing ethical dilemmas. Discussing and resolving ethical problems in the team, and sharing thoughts and feelings with their peers was experienced as a relief. Social
 confirmation and recognition by the patients, relatives, colleagues, and their knowledge that the needs of patients and relatives were attended to in a morally and professionally satisfying manner increased the surgeons’ and nurses’ confidence and satisfaction in their work, and their courage to live with the responsibility for being and acting in ethically difficult
 situations.
 <br>Experiencing the continuous abundance of ethical difficulties in the unit provided surgeons and nurses with opportunities of learning. The kind of ethical knowledge acquired included the acceptance of ethical dilemmas as an inseparable and unavoidable feature of practice, and coming to terms both with the contingencies of human life, and their own limitations and fallibility when trying to provide high quality professional treatment. Acceptance of personal and professional limitations did not mean that surgeons and nurses had abandoned their ethical and professional commitment of trying to maintain and improve the quality of treatment and care to the patients in the unit.
Å leve med etiske dilemma – intervjuer med kirurger og sykepleiere i kirurgiske avdelinger.
 <br>Hensikten med undersøkelsen er å belyse hvordan erfarne kirurger og sykepleiere på
 kirurgiske avdelinger opplever etiske vanskelige situasjoner.
 <br>Bakgrunn: Undersøkelser viser at leger og sykepleiere ofte er i tvil om hva som er det rette og beste å gjøre for pasienten i konkrete situasjoner. Leger og sykepleiere opplever flere og mer kompliserte etiske dilemma enn tidligere pga. økt vitenskapelig kunnskap, økt tilgang til- og mer effektiv medisinsk teknologi, et mer likeverdig forhold til pasienten og organisatoriske
 endringer i helsevesenet.
 <br>Ti kirurger og ti sykepleiere ble bedt om å fortelle fritt om situasjoner de hadde opplevd som etisk vanskelige. Resultatene viser at kirurger og sykepleiere ønsker å gjøre det som er rett og godt for pasienten. Avgjørelsen om å starte, fortsette eller avslutte medisinsk behandling er spesielt
 vanskelig. Samtaler med pasienter og pårørende og diskusjoner i behandlingsteamet er viktig for å oppnå enighet og løse etiske dilemmaer. Å få bekreftelse fra pasienter, pårørende, kollegaer og egen samvittighet om at pasientens behov er ivaretatt på en etisk og profesjonell god måte øker kirurgenes og sykepleiernes trygghet og tilfredsstillelse i arbeidet.
 <br>Etiske dilemma oppleves både som en belastning og en mulighet til å lære av erfaringen. Kirurgene og sykepleierne betrakter etiske dilemma som en uunngåelig og uadskillelig del av yrkesutøvelsen. De erkjenner at livet er skjørt og uforutsigbart, noe som gir muligheter og
 setter grenser for yrkesutøvelsen. Kirurgene og sykepleierne aksepterer egen usikkerhet,
 sårbarhet og feilbarlighet i etisk vanskelige situasjoner, samtidig som de arbeider kontinuerlig for å forbedre kvaliteten på behandlings og pleietilbudet til pasienten.
Date
2010-05-11Type
Doctoral thesisIdentifier
oai:munin.uit.no:10037/2468978-82-7589-258-2
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/2468
URN:NBN:no-uit_munin_2215
Copyright/License
openAccessCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.