Genetic research in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: beginning the conversation
Keywords
HealthResearch
Social Policy
Ethics
Community health
Diseases
Indigenous health
Indigenous
Cultural diversity
Health policy
Health system
Community
Indigenous policy
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://apo.org.au/?q=node/26150Abstract
Human genetic research is a rapidly developing field that promises to deliver a range of health benefits to the population in general. However, genetic research that takes place with minority groups raises many sensitive issues and has generated much debate in scientific journals and the media. Attempts at genetic research in Indigenous communities have proven particularly controversial. Indigenous peoples have raised concerns about a lack of benefit to their communities, a diversion of attention and resources from non-genetic causes of health disparities and racism in health care, a reinforcement of ‘victim-blaming’ approaches to health inequalities, and possible misuse of blood and tissue samples. The philosophical and cultural implications of genetic research can fundamentally change the ways that we think about our bodies, disease, human variation and what it means to be human. For Indigenous peoples, these can also challenge one’s sense of identity and cultural beliefs. In Australia, these issues have acted as a barrier to conducting genetic research in Indigenous communities, and, as a result, genetic research in Australian Indigenous populations is in its infancy. This is in sharp contrast with comparable Indigenous groups in Canada, the United States and Aotearoa/New Zealand, which have been considering the use of genetic technologies and participating in genetic research for some time. Drawing on international literature and local contexts, this paper reviews the ethical issues relevant to genetic research in an Australian Indigenous context, including informed consent, storage of samples, privacy and confidentiality, ownership and use of samples, commercialisation, benefits to the community, effects on collective identity and risks to community harmony. Finally, it considers how Australian researchers and Indigenous communities can constructively respond to the challenges of genetic research such that Indigenous Australians can equally benefit from genomic advances.Date
29 August, 2011Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:26150http://apo.org.au/?q=node/26150
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Good Practices in Health Financing : Lessons from Reforms in Low and Middle-Income CountriesWaters, Hugh R.; Schieber, George J.; Gottret, Pablo (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2012-05-25)This volume focuses on nine countries that have completed, or are well along in the process of carrying out, major health financing reforms. These countries have significantly expanded their people's health care coverage or maintained such coverage after prolonged political or economic shocks. In doing so, this report seeks to expand the evidence base on good performance in health financing reforms in low- and middle-income countries. The countries chosen for the study were Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Estonia, the Kyrgyz Republic, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, and Vietnam. With health at the center of global development policy on humanitarian as well as economic and health security grounds, the international community and developing countries are closely focused on scaling up health systems to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), improving financial protection, and ensuring long-term financing to sustain these gains. With the scaling up of aid, both donors and countries have come to realize that money alone cannot buy health gains or prevent impoverishment due to catastrophic medical bills. This realization has sent policy makers looking for reliable evidence about what works and what does not, but they have found little to guide their search.
-
Better Outcomes through Health Reforms in the Russian Federation : The Challenge in 2008 and BeyondMarquez, Patricio V. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-02)The purpose of this discussion paper is
 to discuss selected health challenges in the Russian
 Federation, focusing on outcomes, expenditures and options
 for policy and institutional reforms in the health care
 system. The areas covered in the paper draw on recent
 studies and reports, and take into account lessons derived
 from the implementation of the World Bank-funded Health
 Reform Implementation Project (HRIP) at the federal level
 and in the Chuvash Republic and the Voronezh Oblast-the
 pilot regions of the project, over the 2005-2007 period.
-
Who pays? Out-of-Pocket Health Spending and Equity Implications in the Middle East and North AfricaElgazzar, Heba; Arfa, Chokri; Salti, Nisreen; Majbouri, Mehdi; Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad; Raad, Firas; Chaaban, Jad; Fesharaki, Sanaz; Mataria, Awad (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-29)Ensuring affordable, effective health care and financial protection against the adverse effects of household out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditures represents an important policy objective in most countries, yet relatively little evidence exists regarding patterns and implications of household health expenditures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This paper examines the scope of out-of-pocket expenditures and their implications on living standards and policy reforms in six MENA countries including Yemen, the West Bank and Gaza, Egypt, Iran, Tunisia, and Lebanon. Results show that OOP payments represent a relatively high share of total national health care financing at 49 percent on average in the MENA region as of 2006. Households pay an average of 6 percent of their total household expenditure on health. Most of this OOP is spent on medications, doctor visits and diagnostic services. Lower-income and rural households generally face greater financial risk; yet this is reversed where private health services are utilized and paid for more frequently by higher-income groups. 7 to 13 percent of households face particularly high OOP payments, or catastrophic expenditures equal to at least 10 percent of household spending. Poverty rates tend to increase by up to 20 percent after health care spending is accounted for. Results are discussed in light of ongoing policy efforts to strengthen social protection for health care.