Author(s)
C Guvercin; MD, Doctoral student, Medical Ethics and History of Medicinel Ankara University Health Sciences InstituteBerna Arda; Professor of Medical Ethics, Ankara University, School of Medicine
Keywords
Eugenics; medical ethics; public policies; Turkey; genetics;medicine; ethics; philosophy;
QH426-47; BJ1298-1335; R723-726;
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
All prospective studies and purposes to improve cure and create a race that would be exempt of various diseases and disabilities are generally defined as eugenic procedures. They aim to create the “perfect” and “higher” human being by eliminating the “unhealthy” prospective persons. All of the supporting actions taken in order to enable the desired properties are called positive eugenic actions; the elimination of undesired properties are defined as negative eugenics. In addition, if such applications and approaches target the public as a whole, they are defined as macro-eugenics. On the other hand, if they only aim at individuals and/or families, they are called micro-eugenics. As generally acknowledged, Galton re-introduced eugenic proposals, but their roots stretch as far back as Plato. Eugenic thoughts and developments were widely accepted in many different countries beginning with the end of the 19th to the first half of the 20th centuries. Initially, the view of negative eugenics that included compulsory sterilizations of handicapped, diseased and “lower” classes, resulted in tens of thousands being exterminated especially in the period of Nazi Germany. In the 1930s, the type of micro positive eugenics movement found a place within the pro-natalist policies of a number of countries. However, it was unsuccessful since the policy was not able to become effective enough and totally disappeared in the 1960s. It was no longer a fashionable movement and left a deep impression on public opinion after the long years of war. However, developments in genetics and its related fields have now enabled eugenic thoughts to reappear under the spotlight and this is creating new moral dilemmas from an ethical perspective.Date
2010-07-29Type
SurveyIdentifier
oai:www.equinoxpub.com:article/9294http://www.equinoxpub.com/index.php/HRGE/article/view/9294