Råhýåfthaÿ akhalgh-ï be seghtë janin; ýëk barasi mouredí (Ethical approaches to abortion: a case study)
Author(s)
Eslami, S.Keywords
AutonomyEthics
Fatwas
Feminist Ethics
Islamic Ethics
Justice
Killing
Koran
Medical Ethics
Morality
Muslim World
Pregnancy
Rape
Rights
Sharia
Violence
Religious Ethics
Sexuality / Gender
Moral and Religious Aspects of Abortion
Health Care Programs for Women
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/984937http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Råhýåfthaÿ+akhalgh-ï+be+seghtë+janin;+ýëk+barasi+mouredí&title=Medical+Journal+of+Reproduction+and+Infertility+&volume=24&issue=6&spage=http://iranmedex.com/english/articles_detail.asp&date=2005&au=Eslami,+S.
Abstract
In his paper, the author tries to deal with one of the most controversial ethical problems of the modern time from a moral point of view; abortion. Is abortion moral? And can it be justified in any situation? Or it cannot be justified in any case? There are four main ethical approaches to abortion: First, a conservative approach, second, a liberal, third, a moderate, and fourth, a feministic one. None of these approaches seem to be able to justify various kinds of abortion. We need to deal with every case separately and try to assess its morality. Accepting this view, the author tries to face abortion due to rape and he argues that this kind of abortion may rest its reasons on four principles: Autonomy, justice principles, self-defense, and the responsibility of society toward the pregnant woman as a victim of violence and rape. According to these principles, if a woman is raped and becomes pregnant, it is her personal choice to continue her pregnancy or abort it. Then the author goes into some jurisprudential details from an Islamic perspective and tries to defend his position by citing some famous Islamic legal decisions, or "Fatwa?s.Date
2016-01-08Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/984937Medical Journal of Reproduction and Infertility 2005 24(6): 342-321 Accessed: http://iranmedex.com/english/articles_detail.asp [2010 August 30]
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/984937
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Råhýåfthaÿ+akhalgh-ï+be+seghtë+janin;+ýëk+barasi+mouredí&title=Medical+Journal+of+Reproduction+and+Infertility+&volume=24&issue=6&spage=http://iranmedex.com/english/articles_detail.asp&date=2005&au=Eslami,+S.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.