Author(s)
Wikler, DanielKeywords
Advisory CommitteesBioethical Issues
Bioethics
Communication
Competence
Curriculum
Economics
Editorial Policies
Education
Ethical Analysis
Ethical Theory
Ethicists
Ethics
Ethics Committees
Health
Health Care
Interdisciplinary Communication
Literature
Medical Education
Methods
Moral Policy
Normative Ethics
Philosophy
Professional Competence
Public Policy
Resource Allocation
Technical Expertise
Values
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=What+Has+Bioethics+to+Offer+Health+Policy?&title=Milbank+Quarterly.++&volume=69&issue=2&pages=233-251&date=1991&au=Wikler,+Danielhttps://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3350203
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/737119
Abstract
This article will focus narrowly on bioethics as normative ethics: the attempt to determine what is right and what is wrong. Descriptive ethics -- the study of what people believe or do -- belongs to the field of bioethics as well, but raises different methodological issues. Within normative ethics, I will take moral philosophy as mother discipline; not in the sense that only philosophers are competent bioethicists (whether a background in philosophy is essential or even advantageous is one of the questions at issue), but because any relevant theories of ethics used in bioethics will likely be philosophical theories. These theories might be put forward by social scientists, theologians, or anyone else, but their competition and their predecessors will be the products of those working in the tradition begun by Socrates and Plato, the professional philosophers.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/73711910.2307/3350203
Milbank Quarterly. 1991; 69(2): 233-251.
0887-378X
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=What+Has+Bioethics+to+Offer+Health+Policy?&title=Milbank+Quarterly.++&volume=69&issue=2&pages=233-251&date=1991&au=Wikler,+Daniel
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3350203
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/737119
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.