Author(s)
Saunders, BenKeywords
ConsequentialismEthics
Students
Philosophical Ethics
Bioethics Education
Education for Health Care Professionals
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=How+to+teach+moral+theories+in+applied+ethics.&title=Journal+of+medical+ethics+&volume=36&issue=10&date=2010-10&au=Saunders,+Benhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.032052
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1021068
Abstract
Recent discussion has focused on whether or not to teach moral theories, and, if yes, to what extent. In this piece the author argues that the criticisms of teaching moral theories raised by Rob Lawlor should lead us to reconsider not whether but how to teach moral theories. It seems that most of the problems Lawlor identifies derive from an uncritical, theory-led approach to teaching. It is suggested that we might instead start by discussing practical cases or the desiderata of a successful moral theory, and then build up to comparing theories such as consequentialism, deontology, and so on. In this way, theories are taught but students do not take them to be the alpha and omega of moral thinking.Date
2016-01-09Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/1021068doi:10.1136/jme.2009.032052
Journal of medical ethics 2010 Oct; 36(10): 635-8
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=How+to+teach+moral+theories+in+applied+ethics.&title=Journal+of+medical+ethics+&volume=36&issue=10&date=2010-10&au=Saunders,+Ben
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.032052
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1021068
DOI
10.1136/jme.2009.032052ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/jme.2009.032052