Keywords
AdministratorsClinical Ethics
Clinical Ethics Committees
Decision Making
Drugs
Economics
Emergency Care
Ethics
Ethics Committees
Goals
Health
Health Care
Health Care Delivery
Institutional Ethics
Institutional Policies
Interprofessional Relations
Medical Ethics
Medicine
Moral Obligations
Managed Care
Organization and Administration
Patient Care
Patients
Professional Ethics
Professional Patient Relationship
Stakeholders
Standards
Time Factors
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Satisfaction,+Managed+Ethics,+and+the+Duty+to+Design&title=HEC+&volume=9&issue=4&pages=333-354&date=1997&au=Feldstein,+Bruce+D.http://hdl.handle.net/10822/752421
Abstract
Healthcare ethics committee (HEC) members and healthcare professionals at all levels are facing a crisis in ethics as a result of the pervasive organizational, economic, scientific, and technological changes in medicine and healthcare. Our current approach to medical ethics does not effectively address the fundamental challenge this crisis poses: to provide ethically principled care to the satisfaction of all stakeholders. In this paper we present a new approach that extends the scope and understanding of ethics by building links between the disciplines of ethics, management, and design. We call such an approach "Managed Ethics and Design." After outlining the main tenets of this approach, we illustrate its application with a design-based quality improvement project at the Kaiser-Permanente Medical Center at Santa Clara, California, that successfully enhanced delivery of thrombolytic drugs to treat patients arriving with acute MI. We conclude that in order to provide and ensure ethically principled care to the satisfaction of all stakeholders, we have a "duty to design," a duty to improve, create and innovate new practices, processes, standards, and understandings of healthcare. Good design can lead to new possibilities that will enable us to achieve higher, rather than lower, ethical standards. In the current era of organizational medicine and managed care, the duty to design is an inescapable moral imperative.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/752421HEC (HealthCare Ethics Committee) Forum. 1997 Dec; 9(4): 333-354.
0956-2737
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Satisfaction,+Managed+Ethics,+and+the+Duty+to+Design&title=HEC+&volume=9&issue=4&pages=333-354&date=1997&au=Feldstein,+Bruce+D.
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/752421
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.