Author(s)
Hayry, MattiKeywords
AutonomyDrugs
Freedom
Harm
Medicine
Pain
Patients
Psychoactive Drugs
Values
Philosophical Ethics
Drugs and Drug Industry
Health Care for Particular Diseases or Groups
Health Care for Substance Abusers / Users of Controlled Substances
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Prescribing+cannabis:+freedom,+autonomy,+and+values&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=30&issue=4&spage=333-336&date=2004-08&au=Hayry,+Mattihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.001347
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/989029
Abstract
In many Western jurisdictions cannabis, unlike most other psychoactive drugs, cannot be prescribed to patients even in cases where medical professionals believe that it would ease the patient's pain or anxiety. The reasons for this prohibition are mostly ideological, although medical and moral arguments have been formulated to support it. In this paper, it is argued that freedom, properly understood, provides a sound ethical reason to allow the use of cannabis in medicine. Scientific facts, appeals to harm and autonomy, and considerations of symbolic value cannot consistently justify prohibitions.Date
2016-01-08Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/989029doi:10.1136/jme.2002.001347
Journal of Medical Ethics 2004 August; 30(4): 333-336
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Prescribing+cannabis:+freedom,+autonomy,+and+values&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=30&issue=4&spage=333-336&date=2004-08&au=Hayry,+Matti
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.001347
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/989029
DOI
10.1136/jme.2002.001347ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/jme.2002.001347