Patient Truthfulness: A Test of Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship
Keywords
AutonomyContracts
Consent
Deception
Disclosure
Ethical Analysis
Ethics
Literature
Medical Ethics
Moral Obligations
Motivation
Paternalism
Patient Care
Patients
Physician Patient Relationship
Physicians
Professional Patient Relationship
Recall
Risks and Benefits
Truth Disclosure
Values
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Patient+Truthfulness:+a+Test+of+Models+of+the+Physician-Patient+relationship&title=Journal+of+Medicine+and+Philosophy.+&volume=9&issue=4&pages=353-372&date=1984&au=Vanderpool,+Harold+Y.https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/9.4.353
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/725512
Abstract
Although truthtelling by physicians has been discussed extensively in the medical ethics literature, little attention has been given to the truthfulness and accuracy of information which patients convey to physicians. The authors discuss this issue in relation to two models of the physician patient relationship: the paternalistic model, in which truthfulness is a relative value subsidiary to assessment of risks and benefits, and the agency model, which assumes that both physician and patient are free moral agents. They argue that the agency (autonomy or contractual) model is inherently flawed in numerous circumstances, even those involving informed and competent adult patients, while the paternalistic model is also problematic and sometimes immoral. (KIE abstract)Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/72551210.1093/jmp/9.4.353
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1984 Nov; 9(4): 353-372.
0360-5310
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Patient+Truthfulness:+a+Test+of+Models+of+the+Physician-Patient+relationship&title=Journal+of+Medicine+and+Philosophy.+&volume=9&issue=4&pages=353-372&date=1984&au=Vanderpool,+Harold+Y.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/9.4.353
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/725512
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
“What Is PER?” Patient Engagement in Research as a HitBélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe; Del Grande, Claudio; Rouleau, Geneviève (Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de MontréalÉrudit, 2018)Engaging patients in research conduct and agenda setting is increasingly considered as an ethical imperative, and a way to transcend views of patients as passive subjects by fostering their empowerment. However, patient engagement in research (PER) is still an emerging approach with debated definitional and operational frameworks. This song addresses the sometimes difficult encounter and elusive mutual understanding between researchers and patients. “What is PER?” is an impressionistic illustration of the challenges and issues that can be found in the universe of patient engagement in research.
-
Do Patients Know How to Use Sublingual Glyceryl Trinitrate?HENMAN, MARTIN; Deasy, Evelyn; Kirke, Ciara; Naddy, Helen (2018-07-06)PUBLISHED
-
[Autonomy and practical identity. Cornerstones to ethical physician behavior].Colt, Henri (eScholarship, University of California, 2006-01-01)Three frequent problems of daily medical practice are analyzed: (1) a physician's perceived obligation to provide medical services regardless of whether one's health care institution provides monetary compensation for the medical act, (2) increasing pressures to obtain informed consent in a national context where paternalistic physician-patient interactions have been customary, and (3) a physician's professional responsibility to offer internationally recognized standard of care even if this means allocating expensive tertiary healthcare resources to a small number of patients in spite of one's knowledge that national governments are unable to provide primary care to millions of their citizens. These problems are discussed from the point of view of the ethical principle of respect for patient autonomy. Potential limiting factors (cultural, financial, religious or disease-related influences) on autonomy of patients and doctors are identified. The functions of patient autonomy in the framework of four different patient-doctor interaction models (paternalist, informative, interpretative and deliberatibe) are described. Physician leaders, health care institutions, and professional organizations are responsible for creating an environment in which doctors can discuss ethical issues as comfortably and as frequently as they discuss biological matters. Health care providers should do their best to recover the human side of medical practice which, undoubtedly, would create a greater likelihood that appropriate decisions will be made when facing complex ethical dilemmas.