Author(s)
de Melo-Martin, InmaculadaKeywords
Biomedical ResearchResearch
Philosophical Ethics
Human Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards
Economics of Health Care
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=A+duty+to+participate+in+research:+does+social+context+matter?&title=American+Journal+of+Bioethics+&volume=8&issue=10&date=2008-10&au=de+Melo-Martin,+Inmaculadahttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265160802393017
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/954825
Abstract
Because of the important benefits that biomedical research offers to humans, some have argued that people have a general moral obligation to participate in research. Although the defense of such a putative moral duty has raised controversy, few scholars, on either side of the debate, have attended to the social context in which research takes place and where such an obligation will be discharged. By reflecting on the social context in which a presumed duty to participate in research will obtain, this article shows that decontextualized discussions of this putative moral obligation are problematic.Date
2016-01-08Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/954825doi:10.1080/15265160802393017
American Journal of Bioethics 2008 October; 8(10): 28-36
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=A+duty+to+participate+in+research:+does+social+context+matter?&title=American+Journal+of+Bioethics+&volume=8&issue=10&date=2008-10&au=de+Melo-Martin,+Inmaculada
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265160802393017
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/954825
DOI
10.1080/15265160802393017ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/15265160802393017