Keywords
Allowing to DieDeath
Deontological Ethics
Economics
Emergency Care
Ethical Analysis
Ethics
Health
Health Care
Health Care Delivery
Health Personnel
Life
Medical Ethics
Medicine
Moral Obligations
Obligations to Society
Professional Ethics
Power
Resource Allocation
Risks and Benefits
Responsibilities
State Medicine
Strikes
Suffering
Utilitarianism
Volunteers
Withholding Treatment
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Striking+Responsibilities.+&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics.+&volume=11&issue=2&pages=66-69&date=1985&au=Brecher,+Roberthttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.11.2.66
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/726890
Abstract
Brecher rejects that argument that health workers are under a special moral obligation not to strike because doing so may result in needless suffering or death. He analyzes this extreme situation and concludes that, unless it is agreed that human life in all circumstances is a completely overriding value, or unless it is accepted that everyone has a moral responsibility for suffering or death in proportion to his or her power to affect it, the argument of the special obligation is untenable. Cannell disagrees, maintaining that health personnel who voluntarily undertake to provide emergency services are morally obligated to honor their commitment. (KIE abstract)Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/72689010.1136/jme.11.2.66
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1985 Jun; 11(2): 66-69.
0306-6800
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Striking+Responsibilities.+&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics.+&volume=11&issue=2&pages=66-69&date=1985&au=Brecher,+Robert
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.11.2.66
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/726890
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.