• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Health Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Health Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Personhood, harm and interest: A reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Beard, Matthew
Lynch, Sandra
Keywords
abortion
Peter Singer
Francesca Minerva
Alberto Guiblini
personhood
infanticide
after-birth
medical ethics
harm
interest
Arts and Humanities
Philosophy
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/263202
Online Access
http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/phil_article/25
http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=phil_article
Abstract
In the article ‘After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’ arguments are made in favour of the moral permissibility of intentionally killing newborn infants, under particular conditions. Here we argue that their arguments are based on an indefensible view of personhood, and we question the logic of harm and interest that informs their arguments. Furthermore, we argue that the conclusions here are so contrary to ordinary moral intuitions that the argument and conclusions based upon it—including those which defend more mainstream methods of abortion—should be treated with immediate suspicion.
Date
2013-01-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:researchonline.nd.edu.au:phil_article-1023
http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/phil_article/25
http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=phil_article
Collections
Health Ethics
Philosophical Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.