Personhood, harm and interest: A reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
Keywords
abortionPeter Singer
Francesca Minerva
Alberto Guiblini
personhood
infanticide
after-birth
medical ethics
harm
interest
Arts and Humanities
Philosophy
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/phil_article/25http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=phil_article
Abstract
In the article ‘After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’ arguments are made in favour of the moral permissibility of intentionally killing newborn infants, under particular conditions. Here we argue that their arguments are based on an indefensible view of personhood, and we question the logic of harm and interest that informs their arguments. Furthermore, we argue that the conclusions here are so contrary to ordinary moral intuitions that the argument and conclusions based upon it—including those which defend more mainstream methods of abortion—should be treated with immediate suspicion.Date
2013-01-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:researchonline.nd.edu.au:phil_article-1023http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/phil_article/25
http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=phil_article