Deciding What Is Best for the Child: The Ethics of Different-Child Choices in Reproductive Selection
Author(s)Kierce, Diane Varley
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractRecent advances in assisted reproductive technologies as well as in preconception, preimplantation, and prenatal screening and testing give prospective parents more information and more reproductive options than previous generations had. But, for families with a history of a serious, heritable medical condition, having more options does not necessarily make it easier for prospective parents to know how to do what is best for their children. Testing is available for a number of conditions for which there is no treatment, leaving prospective parents in a position to make a so-called "different-child choice." If they want to have biological children of their own, they can choose to create only a child that will not inherit the condition or to leave it up to chance whether the condition will be passed on to the next generation. In this dissertation, I consider the moral difficulties that prospective parents in this situation face. I analyze several prominent approaches to selection in different-child choices, including the expressive effects approach made by disability rights advocates, the parental beneficence approach, the parental acceptance approach, and the non-identity problem approach. These existing approaches reach starkly divergent conclusions about the permissibility of reproductive selection in different-child choices. I argue that each of these existing approaches fails to capture the full moral complexity of the decisions these prospective parents face. I then offer my own account of the ethics of reproductive selection in different-child choices, arguing that prospective parents should focus on what is best for the child in their deliberations by acting as a proxy decision maker tasked with evaluating the balance of benefits and burdens for a child born into each possible initial situation. Only by carefully evaluating the expected effects of having a particular condition in a particular family's context can the prospective parents make a good decision in a different-child choice situation. The ethics of different-child choices in reproductive selection are deeply context-dependent, and prospective parents should not expect any easy answers in many of these cases.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.