Professional Solidarity Versus Responsibility for the Health of the Public: Is a Nurses' Strike Morally Defensible?
Keywords
Codes of EthicsEconomics
Employment
Ethics
Freedom
Health
Health Care
Hospitals
Legal Aspects
Legal Rights
Mediation
Moral Obligations
Nurses
Nursing Ethics
Patients
Physicians
Public Opinion
Rights
Strikes
Suffering
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Professional+Solidarity+Versus+Responsibility+for+the+Health+of+The+public:+Is+a+Nurses'+Strike+Morally+Defensible?&title=Nursing+Ethics.++&volume=4&issue=4&pages=283-293&date=1997&au=Tabak,+Nilihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1191/096973397669924911
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/752757
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to deliberate the moral and legal dilemma entailed in the weapon of the labour strike as a pressure tactic on the Israeli Finance Ministry regarding job slots, budgets and, in effect, violating the collective agreement signed by the nurses and impairing patients' treatment, as opposed to refraining from striking and suffering the heavy burden of work, the lack of trained personnel, low wages, and the inability to give patients proper, high quality treatment.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/75275710.1191/096973397669924911
Nursing Ethics. 1997 Jul; 4(4): 283-293.
0969-7330
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Professional+Solidarity+Versus+Responsibility+for+the+Health+of+The+public:+Is+a+Nurses'+Strike+Morally+Defensible?&title=Nursing+Ethics.++&volume=4&issue=4&pages=283-293&date=1997&au=Tabak,+Nili
http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/096973397669924911
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/752757