Author(s)
Morse, Stephen J.Keywords
Criminal procedureevidence
neurosciences
behavioral prediction
medical ethics
privacy
sentencing
corrections
parole
bail
neural measures
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Bioethics and Medical Ethics
Criminal Procedure
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Evidence
Law
Law and Psychology
Law and Society
Law Enforcement and Corrections
Medical Jurisprudence
Neurosciences
Privacy Law
Psychiatry and Psychology
Public Law and Legal Theory
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1619http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2620&context=faculty_scholarship
Abstract
Neuroprediction is the use of structural or functional brain or nervous system variables to make any type of prediction, including medical prognoses and behavioral forecasts, such as an indicator of future dangerous behavior. This commentary will focus on behavioral predictions, but the analysis applies to any context. The general thesis is that using neurovariables for prediction is a new technology, but that it raises no new ethical issues, at least for now. Only if neuroscience achieves the ability to “read” mental content will genuinely new ethical issues be raised, but that is not possible at present.Date
2015-01-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:scholarship.law.upenn.edu:faculty_scholarship-2620http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1619
http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2620&context=faculty_scholarship