Author(s)
Callahan, DanielKeywords
AdministratorsBioethics
Clinical Ethics
Clinical Ethics Committees
Consultation
Decision Making
Economics
Education
Ethicists
Ethics
Ethics Committees
Futility
Health
Health Care
Health Care Delivery
HIV Seropositivity
Hospitals
Information Dissemination
Institutional Policies
Patient Care
Patients
Physician Patient Relationship
Public Participation
Regulation
Resource Allocation
Technology
Technology Assessment
Trends
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethics+Committees+and+Social+Issues:+Potentials+and+Pitfalls&title=Cambridge+Quarterly+of+Healthcare+Ethics.++&volume=1&issue=1&pages=5-10&date=1992&au=Callahan,+Danielhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100000049
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/736424
Abstract
...[W]e are now seeing the flowering of what is an important movement in the field of bioethics: the interplay of ethics committees and broader societal issues. The role of ethics committees in their home institution has been well defined over the past decade. What needs to be explored now is the wider range of issues that really begin outside of the hospital but whose impact is felt internally. There are some issues that inherently arise within the hospital setting, such as when a committee consultation is required for a difficult decision about patient care. Other problems, however, are much less under the hospital's control. Nevertheless, hospitals have to live with these problems, and the decision-making process taking place within the hospital will have to take account of the fact that even though the problem originates elsewhere, there are undeniable internal consequences....Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/73642410.1017/S0963180100000049
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1992 Winter; 1(1): 5-10.
0963-1801
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethics+Committees+and+Social+Issues:+Potentials+and+Pitfalls&title=Cambridge+Quarterly+of+Healthcare+Ethics.++&volume=1&issue=1&pages=5-10&date=1992&au=Callahan,+Daniel
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100000049
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/736424
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.