Ancient Chinese Medical Ethics and the Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Author(s)
Tsai, Daniel Fu-ChangKeywords
AutonomyBeneficence
Bioethics
Common Good
Comparative Studies
Compassion
Competence
Confidentiality
Deontological Ethics
Disclosure
Discrimination
Empathy
Ethics
Family Relationship
Historical Aspects
Interprofessional Relations
Justice
Life
Literature
Medical Ethics
Moral Obligations
Morality
Non-Western World
Parent Child Relationship
Paternalism
Physicians
Principle-Based Ethics
Professional Competence
Social Discrimination
Trust
Truth Disclosure
Value of Life
Values
Virtues
Western World
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ancient+Chinese+Medical+Ethics+and+the+Four+Principles+of+Biomedical+ethics&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics.++&volume=25&issue=4&pages=315-321&date=1999&au=Tsai,+Daniel+Fu-Changhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.4.315
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/757497
Abstract
The four principles approach to biomedical ethics (4PBE) has, since the 1970s, been increasingly developed as a universal bioethics method. Despite its wide acceptance and popularity, the 4PBE has received many challenges to its cross-cultural plausibility. This paper first specifies the principles and characteristics of ancient Chinese medical ethics (ACME), then makes a comparison between ACME and the 4PBE with a view to testing out the 4PBE's cross-cultural plausibility when applied to one particular but very extensive and prominent cultural context. The result shows that the concepts of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice are clearly identifiable in ACME. Yet, being influenced by certain socio-cultural factors, those applying the 4PBE in Chinese society may tend to adopt a "beneficence-oriented", rather than an "autonomy-oriented" approach, which, in general, is dissimilar to the practice of contemporary Western bioethics, where "autonomy often triumphs".Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/75749710.1136/jme.25.4.315
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1999 Aug; 25(4): 315-321.
0306-6800
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ancient+Chinese+Medical+Ethics+and+the+Four+Principles+of+Biomedical+ethics&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics.++&volume=25&issue=4&pages=315-321&date=1999&au=Tsai,+Daniel+Fu-Chang
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.4.315
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/757497
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.