Keywords
AccountabilityBioethical Issues
Clinical Ethics
Clinical Ethics Committees
Consultation
Decision Making
Education
Ethicists
Ethics
Ethics Committees
Evaluation
Government
Government Regulation
Health
Health Personnel
Hospitals
Institutional Policies
Legal Liability
Legislation
Liability
Organizations
Patient Care
Referral and Consultation
Regulation
Research
Review
Standards
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethics+Committees:+Time+to+Experiment+with+Standards&title=Annals+of+Internal+Medicine.++&volume=120&issue=4&pages=335-338&date=1994&au=Fletcher,+John+C.https://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-4-199402150-00012
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/743474
Abstract
Ethics committees now exist in most hospitals. Their recent establishment in many institutions was a response to a 1991 mandate by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Proposed or new legislation in a few states is elevating the status of these committees, either requiring their use in certain cases, allowing them to substitute for judicial review, or granting immunity to those who follow their advice. Despite these recent JCAHO and legislative developments, it is widely recognized that there is a significant lack of data on the effectiveness of these committees and that committee members often lack the requisite education and skills for effective participation in case consultation. We argue that before granting ethics comittees additional authority, there is a need for more research on their performance and a period of experimentation with quality standards governing their membership and operations.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/74347410.7326/0003-4819-120-4-199402150-00012
Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994 Feb 15; 120(4): 335-338.
0003-4819
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethics+Committees:+Time+to+Experiment+with+Standards&title=Annals+of+Internal+Medicine.++&volume=120&issue=4&pages=335-338&date=1994&au=Fletcher,+John+C.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-4-199402150-00012
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/743474
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.