Author(s)
Hawryluck, L.Keywords
Critically IllDying Patients
Ethics
Medical Ethics
Pain
Patients
Sedatives
Suffering
Care of the Dying Patient
Prolongation of Life and Euthanasia
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Neuromuscular+blockers+a+means+of+palliation?&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=28&issue=3&spage=170-172&date=2002-06&au=Hawryluck,+L.https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.3.170
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1010266
Abstract
As we die, our respiratory pattern is altered and we seem to gasp and struggle for each breath. Such gasping is commonly seen as a clear sign of dyspnoea and suffering by families and loved ones, however, it is unclear whether it is perceived at all by the dying person. Narcotics and sedatives do not seem to affect these gasping respirations. In this issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics, we are asked to consider whether the last gasp of a dying patient could be or, perhaps, even should be avoided by administering neuromuscular blockers to palliate dying patients. For many reasons, such as our current failure to alleviate pain and distress, stories of inadequate analgesia and sedation in critically ill paralysed patients and the inability to know the intent-whether to palliate or to euthanise-it would seem that administering neuromuscular blockers should not be ethically permissible.Date
2016-01-09Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/1010266doi:10.1136/jme.28.3.170
Journal of Medical Ethics 2002 June; 28(3): 170-172
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Neuromuscular+blockers+a+means+of+palliation?&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=28&issue=3&spage=170-172&date=2002-06&au=Hawryluck,+L.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.3.170
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1010266
DOI
10.1136/jme.28.3.170ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/jme.28.3.170