Author(s)
Smith, David H.Keywords
Advance DirectivesAutonomy
Bioethics
Communication
Consent Forms
Consent
Decision Making
Disclosure
Emotions
Ethics
Forms
Health
Health Care
Health Care Delivery
Informed Consent
Legal Aspects
Living Wills
Medicine
Patient Care
Patient Participation
Patient Satisfaction
Physician Patient Relationship
Professional Patient Relationship
Sociology
Sociology of Medicine
Terminal Care
Trends
Trust
Values
Wills
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethics+in+the+Doctor-Patient+Relationship&title=Critical+Care+Clinics.++&volume=12&issue=1&pages=179-197&date=1996&au=Smith,+David+H.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0704(05)70223-2
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/756736
Abstract
For historical reasons, much of the attention to the doctor-patient relationship has been based on the concept of informed consent. The concepts of information and consent are both problematic, and as a result, consent forms and advanced directives often undermine the goal that led to the consent doctrine. A better ethic can be derived from stressing the connection between doctor and patient and determining how that connection can be fostered.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/75673610.1016/S0749-0704(05)70223-2
Critical Care Clinics. 1996 Jan; 12(1): 179-197.
0749-0704
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethics+in+the+Doctor-Patient+Relationship&title=Critical+Care+Clinics.++&volume=12&issue=1&pages=179-197&date=1996&au=Smith,+David+H.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0704(05)70223-2
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/756736
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
“What Is PER?” Patient Engagement in Research as a HitBélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe; Del Grande, Claudio; Rouleau, Geneviève (Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de MontréalÉrudit, 2018)Engaging patients in research conduct and agenda setting is increasingly considered as an ethical imperative, and a way to transcend views of patients as passive subjects by fostering their empowerment. However, patient engagement in research (PER) is still an emerging approach with debated definitional and operational frameworks. This song addresses the sometimes difficult encounter and elusive mutual understanding between researchers and patients. “What is PER?” is an impressionistic illustration of the challenges and issues that can be found in the universe of patient engagement in research.
-
Do Patients Know How to Use Sublingual Glyceryl Trinitrate?HENMAN, MARTIN; Deasy, Evelyn; Kirke, Ciara; Naddy, Helen (2018-07-06)PUBLISHED
-
[Autonomy and practical identity. Cornerstones to ethical physician behavior].Colt, Henri (eScholarship, University of California, 2006-01-01)Three frequent problems of daily medical practice are analyzed: (1) a physician's perceived obligation to provide medical services regardless of whether one's health care institution provides monetary compensation for the medical act, (2) increasing pressures to obtain informed consent in a national context where paternalistic physician-patient interactions have been customary, and (3) a physician's professional responsibility to offer internationally recognized standard of care even if this means allocating expensive tertiary healthcare resources to a small number of patients in spite of one's knowledge that national governments are unable to provide primary care to millions of their citizens. These problems are discussed from the point of view of the ethical principle of respect for patient autonomy. Potential limiting factors (cultural, financial, religious or disease-related influences) on autonomy of patients and doctors are identified. The functions of patient autonomy in the framework of four different patient-doctor interaction models (paternalist, informative, interpretative and deliberatibe) are described. Physician leaders, health care institutions, and professional organizations are responsible for creating an environment in which doctors can discuss ethical issues as comfortably and as frequently as they discuss biological matters. Health care providers should do their best to recover the human side of medical practice which, undoubtedly, would create a greater likelihood that appropriate decisions will be made when facing complex ethical dilemmas.