Author(s)
Toon, Peter D.Keywords
BioethicsEducation
Ethicists
Ethics
Goals
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
Medicine
Philosophy
Physicians
Technical Expertise
Values
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Medical+Ethics:+a+Brief+Response+to+Seedhouse&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics.++&volume=21&issue=1&pages=47-48&date=1995&au=Toon,+Peter+D.https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.21.1.47
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/746096
Abstract
Medical ethics is that branch of applied philosophy which considers issues of values raised by medical practice, and should not be equated with 'principlism'. Clarification of facts/values distinctions is an important part of this work. The notion that medical philosophy can flourish in the hands of medical 'generalists' without specialist philosophers, is misguided. Both must work together to promote right reason and right action in medical education and practice.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/74609610.1136/jme.21.1.47
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1995 Feb; 21(1): 47-48.
0306-6800
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Medical+Ethics:+a+Brief+Response+to+Seedhouse&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics.++&volume=21&issue=1&pages=47-48&date=1995&au=Toon,+Peter+D.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.21.1.47
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/746096