Author(s)
Louhiala, PekkaKeywords
DisabilityEthics
Metaphysics
Philosophy
Concept of Health
Value / Quality of Life
Health Care for Particular Diseases or Groups
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Philosophy+meets+disability.&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=35&issue=9&date=2009-09&au=Louhiala,+Pekkahttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.030684
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1027143
Abstract
The question "what is disability" and its implications are addressed in a new book Arguing about disability: philosophical perspectives, which aims to fill the gap between disability studies and philosophy. The structure of the book has been organised roughly on the basis of three branches of philosophy: metaphysics, political philosophy and ethics. One of the main themes of the book is the characterisation of a third way of thinking about disability, a way between two extremes, the medical and social models of disability.Date
2016-01-09Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/1027143doi:10.1136/jme.2009.030684
Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 September; 35(9): 570-572
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Philosophy+meets+disability.&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=35&issue=9&date=2009-09&au=Louhiala,+Pekka
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.030684
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1027143
DOI
10.1136/jme.2009.030684ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/jme.2009.030684