Keywords
Advance DirectivesAdvisory Committees
Bioethics
Biomedical Research
Children
Committee Membership
Compensation
Competence
Consensus
Consent Forms
Clinical Research
Consent
Dementia
Drugs
Emergency Care
Environment
Ethical Review
Ethics
Ethics Committees
Evaluation
Federal Government
Females
Financial Support
Food
Forms
Government
Guidelines
Health
Human Experimentation
Information Dissemination
Informed Consent
Injuries
Investigational Drugs
Institutional Review Boards
Investigators
Nature
Nontherapeutic Research
Organization and Administration
Property Rights
Public Policy
Public Sector
Property
Regulation
Research
Research Ethics
Research Subjects
Research Support
Review
Rights
Risks and Benefits
Science
Selection of Subjects
State Government
Students
Therapeutic Research
Third Party Consent
Vulnerable Populations
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Updating+Protections+for+Human+Subjects+Involved+in+Research&title=JAMA.++&volume=280&issue=22&pages=1951-1958&date=1998&au=Moreno,+Jonathanhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.22.1951
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/756558
Abstract
For decades, all federally funded research involving human subjects has been subject to regulations that require the informed consent of the subject and oversight by the local institution. These regulations last underwent major revision in 1981 and have remained unchanged despite significant changes in the nature of clinical science, the financial sources of research support, and the institutional environment in which clinical research is conducted. In the intervening years, doubt has evolved as to whether the regulations currently in place adequately protect the welfare and rights of research subjects in today's clinical research environment and whether the costs, in terms of time, bureaucracy, and delay, are justified by the level of protection afforded. The Human Research Ethics Group, administered by the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, extensively reviewed the status of existing human subjects protections with the aim of making recommendations to improve and reform the regulations. Here, we present recommendations constituting a consensus of the group members for reform in 3 key areas: protecting subject populations with special needs and vulnerabilities, oversight by institutional review boards, and regulatory policy.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/75655810.1001/jama.280.22.1951
JAMA. 1998 Dec 9; 280(22): 1951-1958.
0098-7484
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Updating+Protections+for+Human+Subjects+Involved+in+Research&title=JAMA.++&volume=280&issue=22&pages=1951-1958&date=1998&au=Moreno,+Jonathan
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.22.1951
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/756558
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Multi-sectoral data linkage for intervention and policy evaluationLyons, Ronan (2016-07-05)
-
DATA QUALITY IN CROSS-NATIONAL SURVEY. The Quality Indicators Response Rate, Nonresponse Bias and Fieldwork EffortsHalbherr, Verena (2016-07-05)
-
Trialling a new Survey Project Management Portal on the European Values Study 2017Brislinger, Evelyn; Kurti, Dafina; Davari, Masoud; Klas, Claus-Peter (2018-07-03)