Author(s)
Gillon, RaananKeywords
AidsCommon Good
Confidentiality
Consultation
Deontological Ethics
Diagnosis
Disease
Ethics
Health
Health Facilities
Health Personnel
Insurance
Medical Ethics
Obligations to Society
Patient Care
Patients
Physician Patient Relationship
Physicians
Risk
Risks and Benefits
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Trust
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Aids+and+Medical+Confidentiality&title=BMJ+&volume=294&issue=6588&pages=1675-1677&date=1987&au=Gillon,+Raananhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.294.6588.1675
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/729735
Abstract
One of the dilemmas facing British consultants in sexually transmitted diseases who are treating AIDS patients is whether to disclose the diagnosis to patients' general practitioners. Arguments have been advanced for specialists' breaching confidentiality and notifying general practitioners against patients' wishes in the interest of normal medical practice, the patients' best interests, the interests of health personnel and other patients, and the interests of society in general. Gillon examines each argument and concludes that none is sufficient to justify violating physician patient confidentiality in most cases. He argues that the goal of slowing the spread of AIDS is most likely to be achieved by gaining and keeping the "trust and cooperation of those at greatest risk" for the disease, and that protecting the confidentiality of the AIDS diagnosis is in everyone's best interest. (KIE abstract)Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/72973510.1136/bmj.294.6588.1675
BMJ (British Medical Journal). 1987 Jun 27; 294(6588): 1675-1677.
0959-8138
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Aids+and+Medical+Confidentiality&title=BMJ+&volume=294&issue=6588&pages=1675-1677&date=1987&au=Gillon,+Raanan
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.294.6588.1675
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/729735