Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, George P., II
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T12:21:25Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T12:21:25Z
dc.date.created2016-01-06 01:44
dc.date.issued1985-01-01
dc.identifieroai:scholarship.law.edu:scholar-1575
dc.identifierhttp://scholarship.law.edu/scholar/584
dc.identifierhttp://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1575&context=scholar
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/280267
dc.description.abstractThe central issues raised here are whether the two frozen embryos have a legal right to 1) live and be implanted in a surrogate mother, and, when and if they are born, 2) assert inheritance rights in the Rios' estate. Equally important is the question of the extent to which research into the new reproductive technologies should be allowed or restricted.
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf
dc.publisherCUA Law Scholarship Repository
dc.sourceScholarly Articles and Other Contributions
dc.subjectBioethics and Medical Ethics
dc.subjectMedical Jurisprudence
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleAustralia’s Frozen ‘Orphan’ Embryos: A Medical, Legal and Ethical Dilemma
dc.typetext
ge.collectioncodeBB
ge.collectioncodeBP
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:7131335
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/7131335
ge.lastmodificationdate2016-03-21 18:21
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid53
ge.oai.repositoryid552
ge.oai.streamid1
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://scholarship.law.edu/scholar/584
ge.linkhttp://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1575&context=scholar


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record