Browsing Codes of Ethics by Title
Now showing items 1-20 of 12181
-
1 CODE OF ETHICSINDEX......................................................................................................................................... pag. 2 1. FOREWORD.......................................................................................................................... pag. 5 2. RECIPIENTS AND SCOPE OF THE CODE...................................................................... pag. 5 3. PRINCIPLES OF REFERENCE........................................................................................... pag. 5 3.1 Integrity, honesty and probity 3.2 Compliance with laws and regulations. 3.3 Transparency and completeness of information 3.4 Confidentiality of information 3.5 Respect for others and fairness 3.6 Impartiality and equal opportunities
-
1 Compliance and Corporate Culture: Making the Most Out of Codes of EthicsCodes of ethics are attracting more interest in Australian business corporations. They have often been used simply to garnish the public image, or to remind employees of the law. However, they can fulfil a more important educational role in the corporation in shaping and maintaining corporate culture. They also can translate into instruments to achieve volitional and creative compliance, and in turn have a direct impact on transaction costs in the corporation. Keywords:
-
1. Digesting Evidence In his Principles of Philosophy, Descartes says, Deontology and Descartes ’ DemonFinally, it is so evident that we are possessed of a free will that can give or withhold its assent, that this may be counted as on of the first and most ordinary notions that are found innately in us. (Descartes 1644/1965: xxix) In this paper, I’m going to defend a broadly Cartesian position about doxastic freedom. At least some of our beliefs are freely formed, so we are responsible for them. Moreover, this has consequences for epistemology. But the some here is crucial. Some of our beliefs are not freely formed, and we are not responsible for those. And that has epistemological consequences too. Out of these considerations a concept of doxastic responsibility arises that is useful to the externalist in responding to several challenges. I will say at some length how it helps with the New Evil Demon problem, and I’ll note some difficulties in reconciling internalism with the idea that justification is a kind of blamelessness. The internalist, I’ll argue, has to say that justification is a kind of praiseworthiness, and this idea that praise is more relevant to epistemic concepts than blame will be a recurring theme of the paper. While the kind of position I’m adopting has been gaining supporters in recent years, it is still largely unpopular. The arguments of William Alston (1988) have convinced many that it is a
-
1. Digesting Evidence In his Principles of Philosophy, Descartes says, Deontology and Descartes ’ DemonFinally, it is so evident that we are possessed of a free will that can give or withhold its assent, that this may be counted as on of the first and most ordinary notions that are found innately in us. (Descartes 1644/1965: xxix) In this paper, I’m going to defend a broadly Cartesian position about doxastic freedom. At least some of our beliefs are freely formed, so we are responsible for them. Moreover, this has consequences for epistemology. But the some here is crucial. Some of our beliefs are not freely formed, and we are not responsible for those. And that has epistemological consequences too. Out of these considerations a concept of doxastic responsibility arises that is useful to the externalist in responding to several challenges. I will say at some length how it helps with the New Evil Demon problem, and I’ll note some difficulties in reconciling internalism with the idea that justification is a kind of blamelessness. The internalist, I’ll argue, has to say that justification is a kind of praiseworthiness, and this idea that praise is more relevant to epistemic concepts than blame will be a recurring theme of the paper. While the kind of position I’m adopting has been gaining supporters in recent years, it is still largely unpopular. The arguments of William Alston (1988) have convinced many that it is a
-
14. Éthique et déontologieLE STATUT PROFESSIONNEL Le journalisme se pratique au Québec dans un régime de liberté de presse indispensable évidemment à l’exercice de la vie démocratique. C’est d’abord la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés qui garantit à chaque citoyen le droit fondamental à « la liberté de la presse et des autres moyens de communication » (article 2b). La Charte des droits et libertés de la personne du Québec consacre également le droit fondamental à la « liberté d’expression » (article 3) dont dé...
-
170. Library Theory and Research & Free Access to Information and Freedom of Expression (FAIFE) Off-site Workshop: Haus Berliner Stadtbibliothek Simultaneous Interpretation:- Codes of Ethics in Latin AmericaNot all Latin American countries have professional codes of ethics today. There are codes – if one also includes codes of conduct as well that describe rights, duties and
-
1931 House Bill 0033. Resolve Providing For A Commission To Investigate The Admission Requirements And The Code Of Ethics For Attorneys At Law And The Practice Of Law By Attorneys At Law, Persons Other Than Attorneys At Law, Banks, And Other Corporations.Also, variously referred to as: House bills; House documents; House legislative documents; legislative documents; General Court documents.
-
1948 House Bill 1418. An Act Providing For The Addition Of A Course In Professional Ethics For Teachers In All The State Teachers' Colleges Of The Commonwealth.Also, variously referred to as: House bills; House documents; House legislative documents; legislative documents; General Court documents.
-
1961 House Bill 3202. An Act Establishing A Code Of Ethics To Guide Employees And Officials Of The Commonwealth In The Performance Of Their Duties.Also, variously referred to as: House bills; House documents; House legislative documents; legislative documents; General Court documents.
-
1961 Senate Bill 0492. An Act Establishing A Code Of Ethics To Guide Employees And Officials Of The Commonwealth In The Performance Of Their Duties And Establishing A Commission On Conflicts Of Interest Thereunder.Also, variously referred to as: Senate bills; Senate documents; Senate legislative documents; legislative documents; and General Court documents.
-
1963 House Bill 0265. An Act Repealing The Law Providing A Code Of Ethics For State, County And Municipal Employees.Also, variously referred to as: House bills; House documents; House legislative documents; legislative documents; General Court documents.