Public participation in governance: a case-study of participatory budgeting in Lagos, Nigeria.
Author(s)Muse, Sulaimon Adigun.
KeywordsLocal budgets - Citizen participation - Nigeria.
Local Finance - Local budgets - Citizen participation - Nigeria.
Local government - Local budgets - Citizen participation - Nigeria.
Theses - Political Science.
Community development activities.
Budgeting in Nigeria.
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractDoctor of Philosophy in Political Science. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 2016.
Since the earliest period of human history, communities have sought to improve their lot
through self-help efforts, otherwise known as community development activities. These
community development activities are today organized on a broader level and are not limited
to the village level alone, they have become part of citizens’ lives at the village, local
government, state and national levels. This accounts for one of the reasons why they are
linked with ethics such as the definitive control by the citizens, a great extent of freedom by
individuals and groups, a considerate extent of governmental decentralization and wide
spread citizenship participation in the mode of participatory budgeting.
The main objective of this thesis is to assess the extent to which Participatory Budgeting (PB)
is fostering the efficient and democratic allocation of resources and citizens’ involvement in
the planning and management of their localities in Nigeria; and identify the reasons for the
non-effectiveness of participatory budgeting in the country. Using largely qualitative and
secondary data supplemented with primary data, the study examines the underlying assertions
of the existence of participatory budgeting in Nigeria and its influence of on the vulnerable
citizens of the country; it, addresses the dearth of literature on participatory budgeting
particularly in Nigeria as a sovereign nation.
With the achievements recorded in participatory budgeting in Brazil, it became a general
device for promoting the principles of transparency and accountability in govenance. Besides,
participatory budgeting mechanisms are now frequently being incorporated into many other
human developmental efforts, in order to bring about the deliverance of desired services
among the citizens and the communities for the achievement of the real goal of participatory
budgeting, which is to bridge the gap between the rich and the vulnerable citizens in the
community. However, theoretically and practically, participatory budgeting as it is, cannot be
said to be adequately suitable in all intent and purpose to a single strategy, as participatory
budgeting approaches signify a variety of tactics and ingenuities that are laden with their own
unique features which are continuously evolving and growing in leaps and bounds. Hence,
this thesis is established on the theoretical framework of representative democracy and
participatory democracy. Thesis of this nature is pertinent because, a lot of literature abounds
on the potentials of participatory budgeting in Nigeria, no substantive study has been carried
out on the actual implementation and operationalization of participatory budgeting in the
Findings from the thesis show that participatory budgeting process in Epe Local Government
suffers from: lack of awareness by the citizens of what participatory budgeting is all about,
negative perception of government initiated programmes or intervention, such as
participatory budgeting and polio eradication programmes as anti-people, lack of funds and
over-dependent on financial hand-outs from unreliable central government, lack of qualified
personnel from the Local Government office to drive the participatory budgeting process,
incoherent legal framework and political interference, non equality of representatives, (in
terms of wealth, income, and dominant racial groups or ethnicity), solving different problems
with the same paradigm, that is, through the CDAs, the dichotomy between city-based
participatory democracy and community–based participatory democracy, and the
management of scarcity, corruption-leading to extra-budgetary spending, lack of transparency
and accountability, political parties- more than any other stakeholders, determine the flow of
participatory budgeting, the ruling political parties always have the final say, influencing the
outcome of decisions taken by the other stakeholders as far as participatory budgeting is
The thesis therefore recommends that: the emergence of the representatives of the CDAs
should be more democratic in nature, coupled with a better engagement of the citizens, with
the use of social media platforms devoid of interference from the palace/traditional rulers and
political elites, the creation of enabling and conducive environment for participatory
budgeting to thrive with mass enlightenment by the government, the central government
should provide sufficient resources at the appropriate time for the participatory budgeting
agents to carry out their activities, regular and routine training programmes must be put in
place in order to improve the level of competency and qualification of the Local Government
officers, roles of civil society in terms of checks and balances on the particip atory budgeting
process must be well-delineated and defined, presently they are conspicuously absent,
corruption, can be reduced to the barest minimum if appropriate agencies are activated in
their monitoring assignments on the participatory budgeting processes.
The thesis concludes that there is potential for improvement on participatory budgeting in
Nigeria with better commitment from the members of the community development
associations and government at all levels of the federation. This is crucial in order for
government to deliver qualitative life to more citizens, thereby bridging the gap between the
privileged few and the vulnerable masses which will engender better socio- economic
development of Nigeria.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Nigeria - A Fiscal Agenda for Change : Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review, Volume 2. Executive SummaryWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-11)This report reviews the trends in
expenditure patterns in public financial management (PFM) in
Nigeria since 2001, and assesses the impact thus far of the
ongoing government reform efforts. The public expenditure
management and financial accountability review (PEMFAR)
covers areas that have been traditionally undertaken by
separate Bank reports such as the public expenditure reviews
(PER), the country financial accountability assessment
(CFAA), and the country procurement assessment review
(CPAR). This analysis covers fiscal policies and performance
at both federal and state government levels. The PEMFAR is a
consolidated diagnostic tool designed to enhance Bank,
development partners' and member countries'
knowledge of PFM arrangements and reform challenges. The
core objective of the Nigeria PEMFAR is to advise the
Government (federal and participating states) on how (i) to
better focus and sequence its PFM, including the procurement
reform agenda within a broader economic reform framework,
and (ii) identify directions and instruments of
restructuring its expenditure patterns on both macro and
sectoral levels. The PEMFAR also aims to inform
international development partners on how they could provide
more efficient support for the PFM reforms in Nigeria by
identifying the main bottlenecks within the existing reform process.
Nigeria - State Level Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review : A synthesis ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-02-13)This report synthesizes the findings of public expenditure management and financial accountability reviews (PEMFARs) that were conducted in seven states between 2008 and 2009. The states covered were Anambra, Bayelsa, Ekiti, Kogi, Niger, Ondo, and Plateau. The report seeks to analyze and summarize the key findings of the reviews from these states in order to ensure that the key messages from the otherwise voluminous reports are presented in a single, smaller report. The states have different socio-economic characteristics but all operate in a federal system that offers some reasonable operational autonomy in the context of a federal constitution. Under the federal system of government, states have been allocated significant responsibilities for service delivery. The constitution defines the expenditure and revenue collection responsibilities that are under their purview. To carry out their responsibilities, the Public Financial Management (PFM) institutional framework is modeled after that of the federal government. All three branches of government are in place with the executive governor as head of state administration. Given the relative autonomy that states enjoy, each state prepares and implements its own budget. Like the federal government, the framework for state PFM system is therefore defined by the budget process.
Agriculture Public Expenditure Review at the Federal and Subnational Levels in Nigeria (2008-12)Mogues, Tewodaj; Olofinbiyi, Tolulope; Olomola, Aderibigbe; Udoh, Edet; Onu, Justice; Woldeyohannes, Sileshi; Nwoko, Chinedum; Alabi, Reuben (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-22)Agricultural expenditure is critical to
the transformation of the agricultural sector in Nigeria.
Yet spending on agriculture remains at low levels in spite
of the sector’s huge potential for wealth creation,
employment generation, and poverty reduction. This report is
a summary of the findings of the Nigeria agricultural public
expenditure review (AgPER) at the federal and subnational
levels. The main objectives of this review are to (1)
examine the extent to which the size and composition of
public spending on agriculture is consistent with national
and subnational agricultural policies and development
priorities, (2) analyze the efficiency and effectiveness of
public resources allocated to agriculture, (3) understand
the cross-tier fiscal and planning relationships between the
federal government and subnational governments, (4) develop
a database of public agricultural expenditures at the
federal and subnational levels, and (5) provide
recommendations on how to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of public agricultural spending to advance
Nigeria’s Agricultural Transformation Agenda (ATA). In
addition to the federal-level analysis, the review analyzes
agricultural public expenditures in three case study states:
(1) cross river, (2) Niger, and (3) Ondo, and three case
study local government areas (LGAs): (1) Akamkpa, (2)
Wushishi, and (3) Odigbo. The analysis at the federal level
covers the period 2008-12, while the subnational-level
analysis covers the period 2000-12.