Responsible Innovation: A Complementary View from Industry with Proposals for Bridging Different Perspectives
Author(s)
Marc DreyerLuc Chefneux
Anne Goldberg
Joachim von Heimburg
Norberto Patrignani
Monica Schofield
Chris Shilling
Keywords
RRIResponsible Research and Innovation
research integrity
responsible innovation
trust
responsible digital innovation
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Corporate Shared Values (CSV)
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
values
ethical leadership
business ethics
responsible investments
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper presents a consensus view on Responsible Innovation by a group of industry practitioners, each with high level management experience in driving innovation from within industrial companies operating in different sectors. The authors argue that, while a substantial body of academic research on Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) of potential interest now exists, it is failing to have impact in the industrial community, where it is understood to be partially targeted, because many of the concepts, tools and methodologies are not aligned with current industrial practices. This is leading to a misconception as to where industry stands on topics addressed by RRI and difficulties in forwarding a dialogue that is meaningful to both parties. The need to distinguish between processes relating to research and innovation is argued, together with the view that research into RRI should encompass more of the on-going work being carried out in related fields such as the role of companies in society, the debate around Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Shared Value (CSV), responsible digital innovation, the elements of ethical leadership, sustainable investment policies and work on establishing social impact factors as well as public concerns on innovation. Directions for an alignment of the terminology and concepts are also proposed. This paper is to be viewed as an attempt at bridging perspectives with the aim of finding common ground to develop the field of RRI further so that it provides effective concepts, tools and methodologies to guide industrial innovation towards better societal outcomes.Date
2017-09-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:doaj.org/article:4cf87e9459c84aa99b53d173ba650ae42071-1050
10.3390/su9101719
https://doaj.org/article/4cf87e9459c84aa99b53d173ba650ae4
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Quantitative measures of corporate responsibilityΚουϊκογλου Βασιλης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Kouikoglou Vasilis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Φιλλης Ιωαννης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis); Yannis Phillis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis) (Published )Summarization: Corporate responsibility has many facets. It can be viewed as an interaction with the society to the mutual benefit of both partners. A corporation produces goods or services that the society demands. Production should be conducted so that its environmental impact is minimal, the economic state of the corporation is viable, labor conditions are good, and compliance with laws and regulations is satisfactory, among others. A model is presented that uses hierarchical fuzzy reasoning that assesses a facet of corporate responsibility, called sustainability, given a number of inputs, called basic indicators. Inputs are normalized on a scale (0, 1) according to their sustainability status and then combined to obtain a sustainability index on (0, 1) for each facet of the corporation. A sensitivity analysis pinpoints the most important indicators affecting sustainability. Two case studies of multinational companies, one of which is headquartered in Greece, are presented in detail. Both are producers of cement and other related building materials.
-
Διερεύνηση εταιρικής κοινωνικής ευθύνης και εταιρικής φήμης στην ΕλλάδαΖοπουνιδης Κωνσταντινος; Zopounidis Konstantinos; Δουμπος Μιχαλης; Doubos Michalis; Ατσαλακης Γεωργιος; Atsalakis Georgios; Επιβλέπων: Ζοπουνιδης Κωνσταντινος; Advisor: Zopounidis Konstantinos; Μέλος επιτροπής: Δουμπος Μιχαλης; Committee member: Doubos Michalis; et al. (Πολυτεχνείο Κρήτης::Σχολή Μηχανικών Παραγωγής και ΔιοίκησηςTechnical University of Crete::School of Production Engineering and Management, Published )Μη διαθέσιμη περίληψη
-
Application of a fuzzy hierarchical model to the assessment of corporate social and environmental sustainabilityΚουϊκογλου Βασιλης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Kouikoglou Vasilis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~vkouikoglou); Φιλλης Ιωαννης(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis); Yannis Phillis(http://users.isc.tuc.gr/~yphillis) (John Wiley and Sons, Published )Summarization: Corporate responsibility has many facets. A corporation should organize its operations so that its environmental impact is minimal, its economic state is viable, labor conditions are good, and compliance with laws and regulations is satisfactory, among others. Corporate responsibility is intimately connected to corporate sustainability which expresses the economic, environmental, and social standing of a company. A responsible corporation embraces the principle of transparency of data pertaining to its performance and its policies and strives for strategies that enhance its sustainability. A model is presented that uses hierarchical fuzzy reasoning to assess corporate sustainability, given a number of inputs, called basic indicators. Inputs are normalized according to their sustainability status and then combined to obtain a sustainability index on [0, 1] for each facet of the corporation. A sensitivity analysis pinpoints the most important indicators affecting sustainability. Two case studies of multinational cement companies are presented in detail. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.