Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTânia Marques
dc.contributor.authorNuno Reis
dc.contributor.authorJorge F. S. Gomes
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T14:35:23Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T14:35:23Z
dc.date.created2018-09-13 23:22
dc.date.issued2018-03-01
dc.identifieroai:doaj.org/article:5dedac80207e46f0b4fe52b8cbc47e8e
dc.identifier10.1590/1807-7692bar2018170112
dc.identifier1807-7692
dc.identifierhttps://doaj.org/article/5dedac80207e46f0b4fe52b8cbc47e8e
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/306842
dc.description.abstractPolitical, religious, sports and business leaders across the world have been under scrutiny regarding allegedly
 unethical behaviors. The current study analyzes the use of responsible leadership in management research. Using
 a sample of 64 articles published in SSCI-indexed journals over 10 years (2006-2016), we carried out a
 bibliometric analysis to understand the intellectual structure of the responsible leadership literature. The results of
 authorship, citation and co-citation, and factor analyses reveal the most prolific authors and the most notable
 journals writing and publishing on responsible leadership. The most cited works are theoretical, using Western
 frameworks and cultures, and focus on the concept of responsible leadership; only a few empirical/case study
 articles appear. Also, the most prevalent links are between theoretical works and highlight the conceptualization,
 understanding, and roles and parameters of responsible leaders. Six distinct factors emerge, denoting the groups
 of studies devoted to the evolution of leadership, transformational leadership, stakeholder theory and leadership,
 conceptualization and understanding of the topic, and roles of responsible leaders. These various research topics
 show the central tenets of responsible leadership, as well as the existing gaps in the existent literature.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherAssociação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://www.anpad.org.br/periodicos/arq_pdf/a_1853.pdf
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/1807-7692
dc.sourceBAR: Brazilian Administration Review, Vol 15, Iss 1, p e170112 (2018)
dc.subjectresponsible leadership
dc.subjectbibliometrics
dc.subjectbibliometric review
dc.subjectcitation and co-citation analysis
dc.subjectfactor analysis.
dc.subjectBusiness
dc.subjectHF5001-6182
dc.titleResponsible Leadership Research: A Bibliometric Review
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncodeBC
ge.collectioncodeBL
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:15245186
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/15245186
ge.lastmodificationdate2018-09-13 23:22
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid149950
ge.oai.repositoryid52
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Business
ge.oai.setspecTENDOkJ1c2luZXNz
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setnameGlobeTheoLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.setspecglobetheolib
ge.linkhttps://doaj.org/article/5dedac80207e46f0b4fe52b8cbc47e8e


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record