• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

What Do Federal District Judges Want?: An Analysis of Publications, Citations, and Reversals

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Gulati, Mitu
Choi, Stephen J.
Posner, Eric A.
Keywords
Judicial opinions
Bibliographical citations
Judges
Law
Legal Writing and Research

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/3068949
Online Access
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2190
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2805&context=faculty_scholarship
Abstract
We report evidence from a dataset of federal district judges from 2001 to 2002 that district judges adjust their opinion-writing practices to minimize their workload while maximizing their reputation and chance for elevation to a higher court. District judges in circuits with politically uniform circuit judges are better able to predict what opinions will get affirmed by the circuit court, leading to higher publication rates and a higher affirmance rate. In contrast, district judges in circuits with politically diverse circuit judges are less able to predict the preferences of the reviewing circuit court panel, leading district judges to publish fewer but higher quality opinions in an effort to maximize their affirmance rate.
Date
2009-01-01
Type
text
Identifier
oai:scholarship.law.duke.edu:faculty_scholarship-2805
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2190
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2805&context=faculty_scholarship
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.