Contributor(s)
Boettke, Peter J.Keywords
EconomicsPolitical Science
corporate social responsibility
economics of science
federalism
institutional economics
management
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/1920/9655Abstract
The dissertation overviews and elaborates the concept of polycentricity, and applies it to two cases. Spontaneous order plays an important role in many non-market systems. But not all spontaneous orders are productive or sustainable. The concept of polycentricity aims to describe the productive subset of spontaneous orders, including both markets and non-market forms of organization. Broadly speaking, a polycentric system of governance is a collection of heterogeneous decision centers acting independently, but under a common system of rules and/or norms limiting negative externalities and free riding. The role of the overarching set of rules or norms is to assure that the spontaneous order is indeed productive and sustainable.Date
2015-07-29Type
DissertationIdentifier
oai:mars.gmu.edu:1920/9655http://hdl.handle.net/1920/9655