Keywords
the CSR’s measurement is not yet unified because of different perspective and methodology. The question is how to measure CSP through analyzing CSR disclosure. This paper aims to present theoretical background of CSR and CSR disclosure. Based on the conceptual frameworkthe research exposes the drivers of CSR reporting as well as debates prior research on CSR disclosure and its consequences. Furthermore
a measurement method of CSP proposed built on CSR disclosure index in this paper. It devotes to enrich the corporate social responsibility reporting literature
offers implications for practice as well as outlines promising avenues for future research
corporate social responsibility
corporate social performance
disclosure index
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
Business and researchers have paid increasingly more attention to corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in term of their sustainable reports. These disclosures supply information for not only managers in strategic decision-making but also other stakeholders in measuring and evaluating corporate social performance (CSP). Although the development of literature on CSR disclosure, the CSR’s measurement is not yet unified because of different perspective and methodology. The question is how to measure CSP through analyzing CSR disclosure. This paper aims to present theoretical background of CSR and CSR disclosure. Based on the conceptual framework, the research exposes the drivers of CSR reporting as well as debates prior research on CSR disclosure and its consequences. Furthermore, a measurement method of CSP proposed built on CSR disclosure index in this paper. It devotes to enrich the corporate social responsibility reporting literature, offers implications for practice as well as outlines promising avenues for future research, especially in the differences of CSR disclosure among different countries.Date
2019-05-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:doaj.org/article:11e6c2771c164fc5808e1554a795b7aedoi:10.5937/sjm14-18009
1452-4864
2217-7159
https://doaj.org/article/11e6c2771c164fc5808e1554a795b7ae
DOI
10.5937/sjm14-18009ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.5937/sjm14-18009
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Disclosure of Project and Contract Information in Public-Private PartnershipsWorld Bank Institute (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-01-08)This report presents a review of current
 practices on the disclosure of information on Public-Private
 Partnership (PPP) projects and contracts from 11
 jurisdictions at the national and sub-national level
 representing 8 countries. It is part of a broader program of
 work being undertaken by the World Bank Institute (WBI) on
 increasing the transparency of public-private contracting.
 The objective of this review is to present emerging
 practices on the disclosure of information on PPP projects
 and contracts and to distill from these suggestions to
 government agencies on how they can provide more information
 to their public on their PPP projects. There are no grounds
 to believe that PPPs require greater transparency than
 similar projects executed through traditional public
 procurement. However as with publicly-executed projects PPPs
 can benefit from greater transparency. In addition PPPs may
 require considerations and approaches to disclosure not
 present in publicly-executed projects. The remainder of this
 report is structured as follows: section one presents a
 synthesis of observed practices and then a recommended
 approach in terms of essential information to be disclosed
 and the key instruments through which this is done; section
 two presents country case studies in a standardized format
 reflecting the recommendations in section one; annexures one
 and two list relevant websites, legislation and policy.
-
The Russia Corporate Governance Manual : Part IV. Information Disclosure and TransparencyU.S. Department of Commerce; International Finance Corporation (Washington, DC, 2013-08-01)The Russia corporate governance manual
 has been divided into and is published in six parts: (i)
 corporate governance introduced; (ii) good board practices;
 (iii) shareholder rights; (iv) information disclosure and
 transparency; (v) special focus section; and (vi) annexes
 model corporate governance documents. The first four parts
 contain chapters that focus on core corporate governance
 issues, such as a company's board structure,
 information disclosure practices, and shareholder rights.
 Part five focuses on corporate governance issues of
 particular importance in the Russian context, namely
 corporate governance concerns during a company's
 reorganization, within holding structures, and relating to
 enforcement. Part six, finally, offers practical tools in
 the form of model documents, for example company codes,
 by-laws, and contracts. All issues are closely examined
 through Russian law and regulations; the Federal Commission
 for the Securities Market's Code of Corporate Conduct
 (FCSM Code) Code and, when applicable, internationally
 recognized best practices. This manual also provides
 government officials, lawyers, judges, investors, and others
 with a framework for assessing the level of corporate
 governance practices in Russian companies. Finally, it
 serves as a reference tool for the educational institutions
 that will train the next generation of Russian managers,
 investors, and policy makers on good corporate governance practices.
-
Proactive TransparencyDarbishire, Helen (2010-09-14)This paper identifies four primary
 drivers of proactive disclosure throughout history. The
 first is the need to inform the public about laws and
 decisions and the public's right to be informed, to
 know their rights and obligations. The second is the
 public's demand for the information needed to hold
 governments accountable both at and between elections. The
 third is the demand for information in order to participate
 actively in decision-making. The fourth is the provision to
 the public of information needed to access government
 services, which has expanded significantly in the past
 decade with growth of electronic access to services or
 'e-government.' This paper attempts to advance the
 debate around that question by analyzing the multiple
 proactive disclosure provisions in national law and
 international treaties in order to identify the emerging
 global consensus on the classes of information which should
 be included in a proactive disclosure regime. The paper
 examines the practical challenges related to the
 implementation of proactive disclosure regimes and some of
 the lessons learned from which principles for making
 proactive disclosure work in practice can be derived. It
 concludes by identifying some future challenges and areas
 where additional research is needed.