• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Business Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Business Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Mandatory audit firm rotation : a South African perspective

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Harber, Michael
Contributor(s)
Marx, B., Prof.
Keywords
Auditing - South Africa
Corporations - Auditing
Financial statements
Audit committees
Corporate governance - Moral and ethical aspects

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/311987
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10210/291955
Abstract
Abstract: Study purpose and context: Auditor independence is a critical component of audit quality, which in turn is necessary for the proper functioning of capital markets, public protection and economic decision-making. Mandatory audit firm rotation (MAFR) has received a great deal of attention internationally in recent years, as concerns mount regarding the quality of external audits performed and the independence of auditors. These concerns have been exacerbated by corporate financial collapses that result from unchecked management misconduct and fraud. In these circumstances, the auditors are accused of failing to prevent and detect the financial misconduct, or to act as whistle-blowers. Many have claimed that problem goes beyond negligence and that the familiarity and relationships developed between client and auditor over many years of the audit firm appointment has impaired independence and professional scepticism. In 2017 the South African audit regulator, the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA), issued a ruling to implement MAFR on a ten-year rotation basis, effective April 2023. This ruling follows similar regulation enacted in the European Union (EU) in 2014. The debate concerning MAFR has shown divergent views among key audit-industry participants. These views include debate surrounding the additional intentions of the IRBA to use MAFR to stimulate socio-economic transformation in the audit profession by building the capacity of black-owned audit firms and facilitating opportunities for small- and medium-tier audit firms to compete for the audits of large and exchange-listed companies. There is disagreement concerning whether audit quality and auditor independence is impaired in South Africa, as well as whether the existing safeguards are appropriate. The study aims to investigate the perceptions and arguments of key stakeholders in the South African MAFR debate, with specific consideration of audit quality, socioeconomic transformation and market concentration factors, in order to understand and explore possible unintended consequences of MAFR, as well as provide recommendations to audit industry stakeholders and regulators...
Ph.D. (Auditing)
Date
2018
Type
Doctoral (Thesis)
Identifier
oai:uj:31718
http://hdl.handle.net/10210/291955
oai:uj:31718
Copyright/License
University of Johannesburg
Collections
Business Ethics
Responsible Leadership Collection
Corruption and Transparency Collection

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.