Global trade in GM food and the cartagena protocol on biosafety: Consequences for China
Contributor(s)
R. P. HaynesKeywords
Environmental SciencesEthics
140202 Economic Development and Growth
140210 International Economics and International Finance
China
Biosafety
14 Economics
Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
Global Trade
Gmo
History & Philosophy Of Science
Cartagena Protocol On Biosafety
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:62564Abstract
The UN Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety adopted in Montreal, 29 January, 2000 and opened for signature in Nairobi, 15-26 May, 2000 will exert a profound effect on international trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their products. In this paper, the potential effects of various articles of the Protocol on international trade in GMOs are analyzed. Based on the present status of imports of GMOs and domestic research and development of biotechnology in China, likely trends in imports of foreign GM food and related products after China accedes to WTO is explored. Also, China's potential countermeasures to control and regulate imports of GMOs in line with implementation of the Protocol are discussed. China, in recent times, has increased its food and agricultural imports substantially from USA and Canada. China imported soybean 10.42 mill. tons in 2000 and about 15 mill tons in 2001, of which majority are from USA where GM soybean accounts for 60%. The plantation of US Monsanto's transgenic Bt cotton was increased to more than 1 million ha in China in 2001. Though China has paid great attention to develop biotechnology, it appears to have little scope to export GMOs and GM products. So China may consider a range of administrative measures to implement the Cartagena Protocol and to regulate its import of GMOs and GM agricultural products. Consequently, the Regulation on Safety of Agri-GMOs was issued on June, 2001 and followed three detailed rules issued in Jan. of 2002, with a priority to limit foreign GMOs importing by safety certification and labeling system. These were outlined taking into account policies adopted in Western countries such as green barriers to international trade.Date
2002-01-01Identifier
oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:62564http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:62564