Evaluating a peer education program for advance end-of-life care planning for older adults: The peer educators' perspective
KeywordsAdvance end-of-life care planning
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Advanced and Specialised Nursing
Psychiatry and Mental health
Speech and Hearing
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractUsing the A
amp;diecolonldrevaampersanddie;st Sjuhärad (ÄVS) model, this paper evaluates how far researchers succeeded in working in a participatory and responsive manner with peer educators to develop and pilot an education program for advance end-of-life care planning. An action research approach was used to develop a guide that sought to enable older adults to obtain information about treatment and care options. Peer educators reviewed the utility of materials for inclusion in the guide, which they helped develop and write, and participated in a three-day training program in preparation for facilitating discussion groups. A range of evaluative data was collected on an ongoing basis to obtain peer educators' perspectives concerning the extent to which they felt the research team was responsive to their needs and views, using the ÄVS model as a framework for the evaluative process. This user-focused model requires researchers to consider the ways in which older adults' involvement in a research study offers equal access, enhances awareness, encourages action and enables action. Evaluative data revealed that the peer educators felt that they had participated as equal members of the team, that the training program responded to their needs, and that they had learnt from the project. All have continued to work on further research projects to develop, test, and extend the material more widely in the United Kingdom and have used the guides within their own community groups. Evaluation using the ÄVS model demonstrated that it is possible for researchers to work in an innovative and responsive way with peer educators. Copyright © Freund Publishing House Limited.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Factors associated with intended staff turnover and job search behaviour in services for people with intellectual disabilityHatton, C.; Emerson, E.; Rivers, M.; Mason, H.; Swarbrick, R.; Mason, L.; Kiernan, C.; Reeves, D.; Alborz, A. (2001)Staff turnover is a major problem in services for people with intellectual disability (ID). Therefore, understanding the reasons for staff turnover is vital for organizations seeking to improve their performance. The present study investigates the factors directly and indirectly associated with an intention to leave an organization and actual job search behaviour amongst staff in services for people with ID. As part of a large-scale survey of staff in services for people with ID, information was collected from 450 staff concerning intended turnover, job search behaviour and a wide range of factors potentially associated with these outcomes. Path analyses revealed that work satisfaction, job strain, younger staff age and easier subjective labour conditions were directly associated with intended turnover. The same factors, with the exception of younger staff age, were also directly associated with job search behaviour. Factors indirectly associated with these outcomes included wishful thinking, alienative commitment to the organization, lack of staff support, role ambiguity, working longer contracted hours, having a low-status job, a lack of influence over decisions at work and less orientation to working in community settings with people with ID. The models of staff turnover empirically derived in the present study confirm and extend previous research in this area. The implications for organizations are discussed.
Between 'porte-parole' and 'porte-mémoire': Assia Djebar's cinematic voice in the MaghrebSalhi, Zahia Smail (2012)This article studies the roles of women as guardians of cultural heritage and national identity, which they preserve and transmit to the younger generations. While their role as 'porte-mémoire' has been recognized as key to preserving national identity, their story as warriors is sacrificed. This study argues that this sacrifice was made in order to uphold male honour as the guardians and defenders of the nation, and to hide the story of rape in colonial prisons, which signifies a direct assault on male honour. Assia Djebar's novels and films position her as the woman who can now write about those who could not, as the 'porte-parole' who worked to eternalize the story that orality failed to transmit. The analysis of La Nouba des femmes du mont Chenoua (1978) shows how Djebar creates a space for voices to be heard, as she defeats the eternal silence which threatens the existence of her women compatriots. © 2012 Intellect Ltd.
Communicating Food Risks in an Era of Growing Public Distrust:Three Case StudiesLofstedt, Ragnar (2013-02-03)The communication and regulation of risk has changed significantly over the past 30 years in Europe and to a noticeable but lesser extent in the United States. In Europe, this is partly due to a series of regulatory mishaps, ranging from mad cow disease in the United Kingdom to contamination of the blood supply in France. In the United States, general public confidence in the American government has been gradually declining for more than three decades, driven by a mix of cultural and political conflicts like negative political advertising, a corrosive news media, and cuts in regulatory budgets. While the former approach is based on an objective assessment of the risk, the latter is driven more by the perception of the risk, consumer sentiment, political will, and sectoral advocacy. In this article, the author examines three U.S.-based food case studies (acrylamide, bisphenol A, and artificial food colorings) where regulations at the local and state levels are increasingly being based on perceived risk advocacy rather than on the most effective response to the risk, be it to food safety or public health, as defined by regulatory interpretation of existing data. In the final section, the author puts forward a series of recommendations for how U.S.-based regulators can best handle those situations where the perceived risk is markedly different from the fact-based risk, such as strengthening the communication departments of food regulatory agencies, training officials in risk communication, and working more proactively with neutral third-party experts.